• simple@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Webp is pretty good actually, not their fault many apps don’t support it.

      Would be even nicer if we can get JPEG XL off the ground though

      • Tibert@compuverse.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        If Google didn’t remove it from their browser… Not sure in how much time, if ever, jpeg xl would become popular.

        • simple@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          9 months ago

          They’re thinking about bringing it back after Apple said they’ll support it.

      • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Really? What does it add that isn’t already done better by other formats? WebP is just Google having not-invented-here syndrome.

        • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          If memory serves, one of the main selling point that was presented was that WebP was able to compress an image better while retaining more visually relevant information than JPEG.

          • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            It has better compression than libjpeg, but that’s not due to the file format. There are other JPEG libraries that give similar or slightly better results than libwebp.

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Just one thing is the ability to show animated images without being absolutely shit, like gifs.

          Gifs animations have next to non optimisation and each frame is just another full image. And their colour is very bad.

          • voxel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            png fully supports animations (great for short animations but as it’s not a video format file size explodes exponentially as you make animations longer and the resolution larger. it’s good enough as a replacement for typical jifs tho)

            • lud@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              You could do that and some websites use mp4s instead of gifs. I believe imgur calls their peudo gifs “gifv” which is actually an mp4 (or maybe webm/p) with a bit of trickery.

              The problem with using mp4s is that they don’t normally loop like you would expect a gif to do.

              They also get a playback bar and such by default, many browsers also block auto playback of videos.