• theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Actually, yes. Firefox is good but I hate the UI. Okay, Brave seems nice. Love the UI, sync feels slow, and why can I not move the top bar to the bottom on mobile??? Phones are BIG. Don’t make it harder for me to use your product. Okay, there is Vivaldi, king of customisability. Nice, but feels slow. Back to Firefox. Still hate UI. And now wanting a better new tab page. Proceed to discover Tabliss for a good new tab page, and Firefox-UI-Fix on github to give me a better UI on Firefox desktop. Wow, problems solved. I’m sticking to Firefox forever (unless I decide to switch to Librewolf where I can still implement all the same fixes as on Firefox).

      • Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Floorp is Firefox with Vivaldi-style tweaks. Part of it is what Firefox really should be right now.

        If you’re a minimalist, I can vouch for Pulse Browser, with sidebar tabs (native to Pulse, similar to Edge) and Simple Tab Groups, it’s great.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Moved to Firefox a while ago, specifically because of Manifest V3.

      The only issue I’ve found so far is that you can’t log in to PSN on it. Just locks the browser completely and you need to kill it in task manager. Apparently it’s to do with password saving.

    • astromd@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ll consider Firefox when they have extension support on iOS, like Orion does.

      • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        See, the fact they don’t is apples fault, their play store guidelines make it impossible for Firefox to add extensions

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            8 months ago

            App Store requires all web access be rendered in safari

            Any browser you get on IOS is Safari and so you are right that they could have extensions but it would be impossible for their old extensions to match up/everything has to be rewritten

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Good luck with that. All browsing on iOS is Safari, so likely all the FF extensions would need to be remade from scratch.

    • Engywuck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Nope. Many Chromium forks already have very good inbuilt adblockers , which won’t be affected by the MV3 stuff. On top of that, one could also use system-wide blockers such as AdGuard and DNS-level blockers (which is not even a bad idea if you’re on Windows anyway).

        • Engywuck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          8 months ago

          I already upgraded to Brave years ago. Thanks. And fuck Mozilla.

            • Platform27@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              8 months ago

              If anything, they’re worse.

              1. Brave is an advertising company, that blocks everyone, but them. Forcing over people and companies into their system.
              2. They’re heavily in the blockchain ecosystem, with their own worthless crypto.
              3. They take from open source projects (uBlock, Chromium, etc), but threaten legal action when someone forks them.
              4. They install bloat/spyware on your Windows system (later claimed it was a mistake).
              5. Brave, and its CEO is right-wing, lobbying against things like same-sex marriage.

              I could go on.

              • Kumatomic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Don’t forget the worst most condescending people working for Brave. I actually had one of their people antagonize me on social media years ago for not liking their invasive homepage at the time.

              • Hal-5700X@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago
                1. Brave is an advertising company, that blocks everyone, but them.

                So like very other ad company.

                Forcing over people and companies into their system.

                [citation needed]

                1. The crypto stuff is opt-in.
                2. [citation needed] I’m talking about the legal action stuff. Fun fact, Gab made a Brave fork called Dissenter. Nothing happened to them.
                3. Yeah, Brave VPN is BS.
                4. About Brendan Eich, I can’t see nothing about his beliefs reflecting in his work. Looks like he kept them separated. Also he’s a co-founder of Mozilla. So if you’re not going to use Brave because of him. How can you use Firefox? About Brave lobbying against things like same-sex marriage. Will, [citation needed].

                If you need Chromium browser. Just use ungoogled-chromium, Windows version.

      • DrQuint@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        Man’s 3 poignant inquiries away from peddling Brave. Tread carefully folks.

      • DigitalBits@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        System wide ad blockers can’t block a lot of ads, namely same-domain ads or those that are built into the html. Much rarer than the external page kind (DNS ones) thankfully.

      • WallEx@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah surel, I’ll use the inadequate browser but fox the problems with system wide ad blockers, instead of just using a browser, that doesn’t steal my data and let’s me install addons that I want. Google is way out of bounds here imho.

        • Engywuck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Use whatever suits you. I’m just saying that people already using browsers with a built-in AdBlock aren’t going to switch, because they won’t even notice the MV3 stuff.

          • WallEx@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Aren’t all those ad blockers and distribution platforms too? Heard about ABP that sell ad space for example.

            • Engywuck@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              IIRC, ABP used to whiteliste some “acceptable” ads (non invasive, etc…). Frankly, it’s been literally ages since I have used it, so I don’t know how they behave right now. I was referring to AdGuard as a system-wide adblocker, though, which is a completely different story.

        • Engywuck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          As long as these browsers themselves exist. Inbuilt adblockers aren’t extension, are integral parts of the browsers, and don’t need to follow extensions’ rules.

  • Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    I really wonder if this will make any people move from Chrome to Firefox at all because they can’t use their adblockers anymore. There are probably so few people that most of them already are on Firefox I guess.

    • hyorvenn@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Nope, then they will continue to whine about YouTube and Twitch spamming ads even though the solution already exists.

      • HouseWolf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        This ^ some people are weirdly hellbent against using Firefox for basically no reason.

        Had a someone I know recently which between 3 different chromium browsers to find one where the adBlock still worked on Youtube, But would refuse Firefox for the pettiest of reasons from ‘I can’t sync logins with my google account’ to ‘That browsers for NERDS

        • Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          tbf, and I’m saying this as a Firefox user, some of the comments about Firefox here make me wanna just

          Marge Simpson cowering her face away

          The loudest parts of the userbase can change the perceptions of software to outsiders, very much like fandoms.

    • reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      I already moved to firefox, this made me think about stop using google drive and gmail too.

      Technically I would be fucked if google decided to just block my account and they have demonstrated they will do it if they feel like it

      (the case in 2022 about someone sending picture of their own baby to the doctor and was automatically flagged for it. google blocked that persons account and didnt unblock it even though it was proven he did nothing wrong. The pictures werent even sent via gmail, i think, so google just scanned their private photos.)

      I have separate account for youtube, but I worry in the future they might connect it to my main account and start threatening to ban it if i continue using adblock. Now i’m also kind of worried if google decides in the future that something is unacceptable, like making comments against corporations or something.

    • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I for one can say I’m very on the fence whether I make the jump or not, because on the one hand I don’t want to deal with MV3, but on the other hand Vivaldi is absolutely unique and Firefox doesn’t even come close to replacing it in terms of features for me.

      • reflex@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        As a fellow Vivaldi user, you know what’ll really make you sad?

        There was a plugin that offered practically-identical tiling functionality in Firefox (i.e., tab tiling within one window).

        It still exists, but was broken when Firefox moved to manifest. Now it tries to replicate the behavior with individual windows instead, which feels awful to use.

        There’s a Firefox fork called Floorp that purportedly has Vivaldi-like tiling, but after a week with it, I couldn’t figure out how to enable it. Plus, it’s in its early stages and some of the users are vocally anti-Vivaldi (more specifically, anti-Floorp-becoming-Vivaldi-on-Firefox) so who knows—all those features might get stripped off down the line anyway.

        • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah I tried Floorp awhile ago and it looked interesting, but very early development and jank as hell. It might be something to keep an eye on as long as they keep adding more stuff to it…

        • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Tab stacking, tab tiling, the sidebar with all my web panels, quick commands, the completely customizable UI… There’s so much.

      • vpz@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        What Vivaldi features do you feel are game changing? I’m not that familiar with it and would love to hear from someone who uses Vivaldi.

        • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Aside from the completely customizable UI, I’d say tab stacking and tab tiling. Web panels are cool as well, you can have translators, calculators and whatnot in your sidebar for quick access that way. It also has a built-in RSS feed reader which is neat.

    • 9up999@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      No because brave and Vivaldi exist. Also there is Adguard app for Android or software for windows (not DNS one) and then browser doesn’t matter.