• Snowman44@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      ChatGPT just want Mr. Incredible on you.

      I’d like to tell you that the captcha says overlooks and inquiry, but I can’t. I’m sorry ma’am. I know you’re upset. I’d like to help you, but I can’t.

  • profdc9@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    11 months ago

    Everyone knows that the real purpose of CAPTCHA tests are to train computers to replace us.

    • hex@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      This but unironically… The purpose literally is to train computers to get better at recognising things

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      And also to frustrate people who use anonimization techniques including use of the Tor Network to get them to turn off their protections to be more easily fingerprinted.

    • over_clox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The funniest part of that is the people designing the AI systems seem to be completely oblivious to the fact that they’re slowly but surely trying to eliminate their own species. ☹️

      • sheogorath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes the planet got destroyed. But for a beautiful moment in time we created a lot of value for shareholders.

  • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Curious how this study suggesting we need a new way to prevent bots came out just a fews days after Google started taking shit for proposing something that among other things would do just that.

  • Overzeetop@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    There is considerable overlap between the smartest AI and the dumbest humans. The concerns over bears and trash cans in US National Parks was ahead of its time.

  • tacosplease@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    11 months ago

    Just encountered a captcha yesterday that I had to refresh several times and then listen to the audio playback. The letters were so obscured by a black grid that it was impossible to read them.

  • superkret@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    online study
    not peer reviewed
    “published” on arxiv (which is a public document server, not a journal)
    study and authors not named or linked in the article

    tl/dr: “Someone uploaded a pdf and we’re writing about it.”

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I suppose it’s this paper. Most prolific author seems to be Gene Tsudik, h-index of 103. Yeah that’s not “someone”. Also the paper is accepted for USENIX Security 2023, which is actually ongoing right now.

      Also CS doesn’t really do academia like other sciences, being somewhere on the intersection of maths, engineering, and tinkering. Shit’s definitely not invalid just because it hasn’t been submitted to a journal this could’ve been a blog post but there’s academics involved so publish or perish applies.

      Or, differently put: If you want to review it, bloody hell do it it’s open access. A quick skim tells me “way more thorough than I care to read for the quite less than extraordinary claim”.

    • CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean its pretty obvious that nowadays AI is absolutely capable of doing that and some people are just blind or fat finger the keyboard.

  • Rhaedas@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    So just keep the existing tests and change the passing ones to not get access. Checkmate robots.

    Just kidding, I welcome our robot overlords…I’ll act as your captcha gateway.

  • NathanielThomas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    I failed a captcha repeatedly until I discovered you can listen to a description and then enter it. Visually I could not figure out what I was looking at

  • sprl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve had to do 15 different captcha tests one after the other and they still wouldn’t validate me today.

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    So is it time to get rid of them then? Usually when I encounter one of those “click the motorcycles” I just go read something else.

    • panCatQ@lib.lgbt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      They were never a test to evade bots to begim with, most capchas were used to train machine learning algorithms to train the bots on ! Just because it was manual labour google got it done for free , using this bullshit captcha thingy ! We sort of trained bots to read obsucre texts , and kinda did the labour for corps for free !

      • Draces@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m pretty sure they began as bot filters. That’s what they became

    • brsrklf@compuverse.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      “Please complete the next 200 captchas so we can have a reasonably accurate estimate of your success rate”