• 520@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Can fictional products be used as prior art against real world patents though? The entire idea of patents is to protect something someone made work in the real world.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      “The whole concept of a touchscreen device…” is something that prior fictional examples prove false. They did not come up with the concept, but they did implement a prior concept.

      “Nobody thought of it” and “nobody made it before” are two different things. Apple even pretended the second was true when they weren’t even first to market on several of their products.

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        “The whole concept of a touchscreen device…” is something that prior fictional examples prove false. They did not come up with the concept, but they did implement a prior concept.

        But that didn’t come from a patent filing, that was my commentary on how they behaved. Patent filing language is much more precise for this reason.

    • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      My understanding is that patents are to protect novel new ideas. If something’s already bean described in fiction, what innovation is protected by the patent?

      So, I’d think “it’s a tablet” wouldn’t be patentable because that was described in Star Trek. But, "screen technology blah that makes tablets practical "would be patentable.

      Neat post on related topic: https://fia.umd.edu/answer-can-science-fiction-stories-be-used-to-demonstrate-prior-art-in-patent-cases/

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        My understanding is that patents are to protect novel new ideas. If something’s already bean described in fiction, what innovation is protected by the patent?

        The implementation in the real world. Fiction does not tend to go into how these machines work beyond that which is needed for the narrative. You won’t get enough information from such a book or TV show to be able to build something similar yourself, which is usually what you need for a patent.

      • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Patents protect the details of achieving an invention, not the idea for an invention itself (thereby allowing multiple different approaches to serving a market). Most courts are likely to rule that an electronic tablet is a market segment, rather than an invention. But listing out all the electronics and software needed to build one and or the industrial processes and machinery to build one at scale might be granted a patent. Fiction virtually never produces any such detail.

    • phillaholic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not exactly, patents have to be specific, not generic, and Apple purchased the company that invented multi-touch.