Crops can blight, animals can get diseases. I don’t know much about hydroponics but I know that bacteria are a concern. What food source is the most reliable, the least likely to produce less food than expected?

  • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Worms are less of an efficient food source than, for example, beans. The sci-fi trope of eating insects is silly. Deus Ex had it right - soy food is the future. (And the present!)

    • lol3droflxp@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Depends on what you have on hand. Many insects have an almost 90% conversion rate of food to insect biomass and if you have a lot of plant matter or other biological material available that humans can’t consume they are great.

      • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The trope is usually depicted as farming them en-mass for consumption, and that’s much less efficient than just growing soy beans.

        Sure, in a survival situation, it might make sense to eat insects. But on a large scale, it doesn’t really.

        • lol3droflxp@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Farming soy beans also produces waste and stuff still spoils. Turning that into consumable biomass efficiently via insects or other crustaceans is still a viable option. Especially since their droppings make great fertiliser. Including that in a food production cycle is not the worst idea.