• pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Plex is cracking down on pirated content. They can’t do anything locally (yet) but they sent out a mass email about two weeks ago saying that anyone that hosts a Plex server in the cloud (they didn’t specifically mention Hetzner, but that’s who is largely being affected) will lose access on October 12th.

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s because people were creating their own ‘streaming services’ using pirated content and selling access to it using Hetzner servers, which is very bad for all parties involved because it brings a lot of negative attention when actual profits are being generated from distributing pirated material.

      • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, but it sucks for people like me who just set everything up a few weeks ago and are using it privately. I’ve hosted a massive Plex server locally for about a decade, but finally decided to stop doing everything locally. I had it running for two weeks in the cloud before I got the email from Plex. I just setup Jellyfin yesterday and all of my users will have to migrate to that.

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          9 months ago

          That sucks for you, but you gotta understand Plex there as well I think. They know that all their clients are pirates, but they can’t just ignore something like that, lest risk catching unwanted attention.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      People thought hosting copyrighted content on someone’s cloud and making it available to others was a good idea? 🤦🤦‍♀️🤦‍♂️

      This is why we can’t have nice things.

      • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s specifically people doing this and selling access to the servers en masse, like these servers have a hundred or more users each. The don’t care about the small fish that are doing this privately for no monetary gain.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Yeah, I guess it’s often profit-driven. If you can get $5 per month from 100 people, you can probably clear hundreds of dollars per month. So that ten times, and this becomes quite a serious profit stream.

    • PorkSoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Plex is cracking down on pirated content.

      I’m just as jaded and cynical as the next guy, but I think that this is a mischaracterization of that email. People were hosting Plex servers with thousands of users and terabytes of pirated content on Hetzner and selling access. I don’t read them taking action as a signal for them blocking local libraries in the future.

      • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        They all do it just to get the lawyers off their backs. Plex is just a bigger target. Plex can’t block anything locally so they take action against user distributing pirated content on a cloud service and are like “Here, we took action, can you leave us alone now?”. It would practically be impossible for them to block the distribution of pirated content at the local level.

        Plex fucked up when they created their Client-Server model because it allows traffic to run through their servers (the Plex Relay and their “phone home” model). This makes them legally responsible for “facilitating access to pirated content” even though they don’t host the content. Jellyfin doesn’t have this pitfall since you host everything yourself, they just provide the software.

        You’re the second person that says " Plex isn’t cracking down on pirated content… but they’re banning people who are hosting servers with pirated content." If that’s not " cracking down on pirated content" IDK what is…

      • m0nky@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I totally agree, but try petabytes, not terabytes, of hosted media. I know of one that has right now over 2 petabytes of content.

      • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, people act like Plex and other media servers are used for legally obtained content only. Plex is just covering their asses and they can’t block users hosting locally so this is a “here we did something, are you happy now?” to the copyright lawyers.

    • m0nky@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Stop disingenuously spreading misinformation and nonsense. You know full well ‘plex is cracking down on pirated content’ isn’t true.

      Plex are very specifically targeting plex shares that are selling their own Netflix esque streaming service using Plex’s software as their server and client. This is and always has been against their ToS. This is not new, Plex has been banning Plex shares for over 5 years. Hetzner refused to help them put a stop to the huge number of paid Plex shares running from there, so Plex had to block them.

      This is for the good of all Plex users and is to protect people using Plex, even those with pirated content, in the long term.

      • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Sorry I don’t buy it. It stinks of puppeting for rights holders. I moved to Jellyfin as soon as that story broke. I’ve been a Plex pass user for over 10 years (albeit lifetime single purchase) and the only thing I miss is in-TV subtitle search.

        • m0nky@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          Whoopee for you. While I have all the respect in the world for the Jellyfin devs (I have been running JF alongside Plex since early 2019), it is nowhere near as feature rich as Plex, and lacks even some pretty basic features on many of it’s clients.

          If you want a direct play experience on your PC, then sure, Jellyfin server, plus a couple of plug-ins, and Jellyfin Media Player can give an adequate experience. If you want SW encoding (urghhh) then it works well, one directional HW encoding is a pain in the ass, and two directional HW encoding is even more of a pain the ass to get right. JF doesn’t even provide you with a way to reliably know what encoding is going on. Their devs genuinely expect the average user to sift through mpeg logs looking for certain words in certain places, which is poorly documented (if you can even count one comment by a JF dev on Reddit as documentation). 99.9% of people don’t even know what a log is.

          If you want to share outside your home, JF requires a user to either open a bunch of ports to public facing internet (which the average person is stupid enough to do) and hand out their home ip address, or set up a reverse proxy. Again, the vast majority of people wouldn’t know where to start.

          Should Plex disappear tomorrow as a way to play your personal video library across your own devices, then yes, JF could work as a substitute. Emby would be a closer substitute, however.

          You have made the move to JF based on what you think Plex will do in the future, which does not equal ‘Plex is cracking down on piracy’ (present simple tense). Hence, you were disingenuously spreading nonsense and misinformation.

          Enjoy JF.

          • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’ve been running both Plex and Jellyfin for years and I’ve had more problems with Plex than I’ve had with Jellyfin. It’s also easier to figure out what the issue is since it’s open source, I actually fixed a bug and added documentation for the “Native streaming” in JellyfinForKodi since I was able to dig deep into it.

            I’ve always found that Hardware (GPU) Encoding to be a pain to use, regardless of the platform. It also lessens the quality of the video compared to Software Encoding. Get yourself a stronger CPU and don’t mess with HE. I have a AMD Threadripper 2970WX in my home server and it laughs at transcoding 4K with uncompressed audio and Dolby Vision/Atmos. I can do 4 4K simultaneous transcodes with room to spare.

            People pay Plex for the ease of remote access. If you can read or watch a video, it’s really not that difficult to setup remote access for Jellyfin (they have the process fully documented). There’s a key thing here: if you setup the remote connection it removes any liability from the software creators (Jellyfin in this case). If you want to give them $120 or more because you can’t be bothered to figure out how to setup remote access yourself, so be it, but you’re also at the whim of the company.

          • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            You seem really sensitive to this.

            You have made the move to JF based on what you think Plex will do in the future

            Yes. Plex have access to my content, my usage history, my personal details, etc. Giving that sort of information away and trusting a for-profit company to do the right thing is naive at best. I feel happier now that the system is behind closed doors, even if I do miss out on a feature or two.

            Hence, you were disingenuously spreading nonsense and misinformation.

            Not really. Are you mixing my response up with others? I voiced an opinion, that was all.

            • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              They also responded to me me saying “Plex has been cracking down on Netflix style streaming services for 5 years” but then tell you “Plex isn’t cracking down on piracy, you’re spreading misinformation!” 🤣

              I’ve always hated the fact that Plex was sort of a black box, I’ve been using it for over a decade and always had random issues which we’re unable to be troubleshot because there was no information available. One long standing bug is sometimes when you setup a server it won’t connect to the Plex backend and doesn’t register on their end, so even if you visit the local IP of your server, there are zero server settings available. No one knows why it happens or how to fix it, there has been a big report open for it for ages and even the devs/support team are like 🤷‍♂️ when you ask them for help, and this is after paying for PlexPass. Granted it doesn’t happen frequently, but it’s still annoying as hell. “Claiming” your server when its run remotely (especially in docker) can sometimes be a huge pain as well.

              • m0nky@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                9 months ago

                “They also responded to me me saying “Plex has been cracking down on Netflix style streaming services for 5 years” but then tell you “Plex isn’t cracking down on piracy, you’re spreading misinformation!” 🤣”

                Are you mentally retarded or something? Selling access to your server is against the terms of service you agreed to when you installed the software. It has been in their ToS since Day 1. That isn’t cracking down on piracy, it is upholding their ToS that allows their software to exist in a legally grey space.

                Sounds to me like you were selling access to your server and now you’re butt hurt.

            • m0nky@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              My goodness, please stop spreading misinformation. Plex has no access to what is on your server (your content) or your usage history. Where the hell do you get this crap from?

              • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                You sure are incredibly trusting and protective of Plex. For a closed source system, unless you work for Plex, you are spreading misinformation by denying opinions contrary to your own. I would think myself naive to continue to trust in a company showing themselves to be taking action in favour of copyright holders.

      • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Plex’s (almost) entire user base is pirates, it’s the same with Kodi, Emby and Jellyfin. I don’t know of anyone that has legally ripped all of their DVDs and Blu-rays themselves, it’s just too much of a pain in the ass, and I know multiple people that have run servers for years.

        Plex is just covering their own asses from getting sued for “enabling the distribution of pirated content”. Kodi and Jellyfin aren’t big targets since they aren’t a business, they don’t sell a product, Plex (and Emby) does. Kodi and Jellyfin can’t get sued (or it doesn’t make sense to sue them) because they have the disclaimer that says “we make this for streaming content you own, we don’t host anything, we don’t support the piracy plugins, do what you will with it, we’re not responsible for your actions” but since Plex can route traffic through their servers (the Plex Relay) and the fact that they offer PlexPass puts them in hot water.

        Instead of Plex blocking the specific users based on email, specific IP or something else specific to that account, they said “fuck anyone using Hetzner, regardless of whether or not you’re violating our ToS.”

        I’ve paid for a lifetime PlexPass and have actually paid for it a few times over since it took years before I finally bought one. Yet, I get treated like I’m some mega-pirate making money off of them. They don’t give a shit about their users, all they care about is money and not getting sued.

    • Szymon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Good to know, hopefully this creates a drive to make alternatives a little more user friendly to set up

      • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s easy to setup remote access to Jellyfin… once you know what you’re doing. I’ve been doing it for years, and just recently gave Caddy a try as my reverse proxy and it literally takes 3 lines of code to create a SSL secured reverse proxy (literally just Jellyfin.yourfqnd.com { reverse_proxy Jellyfin:8096}).

        I’ve written a docker compose file for each of my categories of apps on my server: Plex, Jellyfin, Admin apps, and Pirating. The Caddy config file is simple so I just copy that to its app directory. My DNS and my CNAME records are already set.

        So after a bit of work writing the aforementioned scripts I can have my entire setup on a new server in about 5 minutes and one command.

        IDK if docker-compose works on Windows, but I’m happy to share it if you run Linux.