• Chozo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    And they actively fought against it for as long as they could, tooth and nail.

    • dunestorm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s an uphill battle, why would Apple bother when just using USB-C makes sense and saves them their lawyers sanity?

      • docmox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        9 months ago

        Money.

        Now that USB-C is the required cable, people can go out and buy any cheap cable they want. The law turned a proprietary cash cow into a low return commodity item.

    • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      9 months ago

      If they were really fighting it that hard they could’ve stalled till 2025 when the EU law actually takes effect.

      • M500@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        They could have, but I think they saw the demand and speculation of a usb-c phone. Maybe they realized that the bad image it would give them if they held out.

        I’ve been waiting for a usb-c phone to upgrade. I’m at a point now that I really can’t wait any longer for a new phone. If they did not release a usb-c phone this year, I would have just bought the cheapest phone they offered.

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Why keep giving money to Apple if you are already aware of their tactics?

          • gr522x@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            If the choice is paying unreasonable prices for Apple’s overpriced proprietary nonsense or reducing my yield as another data cow in Alphabet’s surveillance capitalism human farming machine, I begrudgingly pick the former.

            I think it’s safe to assume all corporations publicly traded are equally greedy, regardless of how much their marketing department assures us that they exist for altruism.

            Shareholders don’t by stock to make the world a better place, they invest in the companies sending the largest dividend checks. Apple and Alphabet are equally covetous of our money (money and data for Alphabet), but I trust the old business model of selling hardware more than giving up my data forever to be used for anything in the future.

            GrapheneOS is my true preference currently for personal use and it feels good to leave a corporation in favor of a community, much like my switch from Reddit to Lemmy. As the techie in my family and friend group I’m still going to have to recommend iOS to most people since using GrapheneOS as a daily driver is a big ask for my grandmother.

          • Nahvi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Same reason that people stick with Google.

            After years in the eco-system it is obnoxious to swap, and the other main competitor isn’t any better of a company to deal with.

            • El Barto@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              At least with Android I have options. Do I want USB-C? There’s a phone for that. Do I not want USB-C (for some weird reason)? There’s a phone for that.