All the news on his speech seems to be about HS2 but I think that this is important too.

  • ndru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Trans people are literally just trying to get on with their lives while bigots obsess about them.

    The same type of people said the same things about women getting the vote, interracial couples, and homosexuality.

    I hope history continues to move in the right direction and leave these nosey fucks as nothing more than shameful memories.

    • betwixthewires@lemmy.basedcount.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      9 months ago

      OK so what if people leave them alone, and let them get on with their lives, but refuse to use preferred pronouns? No obsessing, no talking about a man can’t become a woman what is a woman what are you changing into if you’re already a woman, end all that talk, but people that disagree just don’t say things they think aren’t true? Would that work?

      • IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Being an asshole was never forbidden. I can call a cis man a she all I want. Just because it isn’t illegal doesn’t mean that there are no consequences. Like people will just disassociate from me and my boss might fire me for bullying.

        • betwixthewires@lemmy.basedcount.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          9 months ago

          What do you mean by “consequences”? You want to punish people for believing a man can’t be a woman, even if they don’t go around harassing transgender and calling them names and fucking with their lives?

          • GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Intentionally misgendering someone is a dick move and generally people don’t want to hang around dicks. So first consequence is you’ll have other dicks for friends. Except, they’re dicks, so probably not gonna be very good friends each other.

            I also hope you are self employed cuz intentionally misgendering people in the workplace is not a good look either. Better hope no one in earshot has a trans friend or family member.

            No one’s saying you can’t be Your Best Inner Bigoted Self. We’re just saying the rest of us think it’s ugly and weak minded.

            • betwixthewires@lemmy.basedcount.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              9 months ago

              Alright, so you’re OK with leaving alone people who use pronouns to refer to biological sex, you don’t want to be their friend or whatever but you leave them alone, don’t harass them, don’t try to get them fired and if they get a job somewhere that doesn’t care then fine, leave them alone?

          • IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I never said people should be punished for thinking that. If people aren’t harassing or bullying people they aren’t being assholes.

            Also consequences doesn’t just mean punishment. If someone is being an asshole by constantly misgendering a trans person on purpose and people don’t want to hang out with them anymore because of that behavior that’s a consequence but not a punishment.

            • betwixthewires@lemmy.basedcount.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              9 months ago

              So you’re OK with that? Not personally associating with people that use pronouns to refer to biological sex, but let them be themselves and do their thing and associate with who they want?

                • betwixthewires@lemmy.basedcount.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Well that’s good, I 100% agree with you. But judging by the votes I’m getting for asking this question, I don’t think most people that support the transgender movement do.

                • betwixthewires@lemmy.basedcount.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Yeah, but it’s not without contention. Some people believe it should be illegal to use pronouns in reference to someone’s biological sex. I’m just asking people if they’re OK with it, if they like that, to distinguish from people who do that and people who harass and berate transgender people. When someone says “they just want to be left alone” I’m trying to get whether they view that distinction as valid or not.

      • stillwater@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        but refuse to use preferred pronouns?

        This requires some obsession on the part of the person who would have to try to learn everyone’s gender and sex just so they can purposefully identify and misgender this trans person.

      • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        How would you refer to them? Trans men as “she” and trans women as “he”? Or just avoid using any pronouns?

        • betwixthewires@lemmy.basedcount.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          9 months ago

          Does it matter? They just want to be left alone, they’re being left alone. The opinions of people they don’t even want to interact with have no bearing on their lives, so long as they’re genuinely being left alone. No laws against being transgender, no discrimination against transgender people in hiring or whatever, no harassment, but some people are going to use pronouns based on sex instead of gender because they personally don’t buy it. Is that OK?

          • foksmash@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            I think a lot of people would be happy to settle into this camp. Happy to oblige but allowed to keep their opinion without being villainized.

              • foksmash@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Yes, that’s what I mean. The stated request was that trans people just want to be left alone. Most people would be happy to do that. I agree with you.

          • theuberwalrus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            If you change your name, and I believe people shouldn’t be able to change their name, is it ok for me to only use your old name?

          • OurTragicUniverse@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            So if someone decided you were trans and started calling you by the wrong pronouns, you’d be ok with that?
            Like if they personally just don’t believe your presented gender and want to publically harrass you about it, are you allowed to put up a fuss in this scenario of yours? Or is that OK?

  • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Hey, will you look at the time!

    Its ‘generate political cover for the Tories privatizing the NHS’ o’clock again!

  • DessertStorms@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I think if anything this is more important.
    Sure, HS2 is a complete shambles and an embarrassment and we should be criticising what’s going on, but this is a calculated and deliberate attack on human rights, and is a significantly bigger red flag that I wish more people took seriously.

  • Nakedmole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    He is a despicable right-conservative populist who obviously says this for all the wrong reasons but that does not change the fact that the statement by itself is a correct one. Humans can change their gender, that is possible because gender is a more or less internalised, socio-cultural and therefore psychological construct. The sex of a human on the other hand is an inherent, biological and physiological quality, written into each cells DNA. Therefore the sex of a person could only be changed by replacing chromosomes in every single cell of the individuals body. I very much hope for all trans people that it will become medically possible to change their sex in the future but at this point it is simply not medically possible and to deny this truth will not make the lifes of trans people better.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s really not necessary to bend over backwards to defend him. If he was talking about chromosomes he’d have had no reason to say anything because it would just been a pointless non sequitur with no political relevance. He obviously meant it as an attack against trans people’s existence.

      • Nakedmole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I never defended him and I don´t get why you project such nonsense on me after I clearly wrote:

        He is a despicable right-conservative populist who obviously says this for all the wrong reasons but that does not change the fact that the statement by itself is a correct one.

        Are you unable to separate between the person and the statement?

  • dunestorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s simple, gender can be changed but sex cannot. End of story, anyone who argues otherwise is objectively wrong.

    • galmuth@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’re not technically wrong, but it’s a nuanced issue and people should treat it as such rather than black and white.

      Sunak saying “no one can change sex” without any qualifying statements is just designed to inflame and divide people.

      • Gamoc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        No it’s designed to gain support from ignorant bigots who have nothing better to do than think about other people’s genitals all the damn time, but are completely incapable of actual learning anything that isn’t shoveled down their throat by a far right psychopath who stands to gain from what they’re saying.

      • Gyromobile@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s designed to offer a firm take on the nuanced issue. A lot of people feel like they are tired of being told they are crazy (on both sides).

        It feels like if someone (self) inserts gender where he says sex here, they are looking for reasons to be upset.

    • fiat_lux@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Clown fish start life as males, and become female in adulthood. Gobies can switch back and forth between male and female. So far, we know of maybe 500 species of fish that can change sex.

      I understand people are not fish, but I’m not sure we should be so quick to declare something about people “can’t be changed” with enough time, knowledge and science. Sex and gender are both complicated systems with lots of opportunity for unexpected variations affecting seemingly unrelated parts of a person.

      It’s even possible for your body to have more than one set of chromosomes, it’s called Chromosomal Mosaicism and is detected in around 1-2% of pregnancies. Not all of those pregnancies make it full term, and not all mosaics are retained by the foetus, but in a world of billions of people it still ends up being a lot of people who are sexually diverse.

      Biology is not simple. Do not underestimate the weird things your body can randomly surprise you with.

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I dare you to take HRT for a couple of years and then say that again (obviously not really, but you clearly don’t give a shit about biology, which would prove you wrong, and are only here to spread ignorance in the name of transphobia)