Recently discovered this. Molly supports link with existing device just like on signal desktop. It even has benefit of getting entire chat history unlike signal desktop. Just restore the signal backup file during setup and then click link with existing device. Then scan with you primary phone. Beauty of open source. Molly: https://molly.im/

  • muggedTassi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Is there any real security-minimizing reason why it’s not wanted by the official app to have multiple mobile devices linked to one Signal account? (I’m not even talking about a second phone with another SIM card, I just wanna use it on my tablet).
    I would appreciate a simple/ELI5 style explanation if there is one, I don’t work in IT.

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Element as a client with a Matrix server bridged to Signal works great, too. Centralizes your history on your own secure server, too.

    More complex, though.

    • pensivepangolin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Also worth noting that communication between signal and matrix through most bridges requires the message to be decrypted and reencrypted, thereby breaking E2EE which kinda defeats the point.

      Unless you’re running a bridge on a locked down home server on your own network, not sure it’s the most secure.

      • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Very good point. For me its a private server and I run both the bridge and the matrix server inside the same docker network.

  • zShxck@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m using molly for several months now it is really nice but recently I dive myself in XMPP and it is superior to molly/signal just because XMPP servers are auditable amd you can actually see if the server is using encryption or not while signal servers are closed source unfortunately, it’s their only flaw

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The signal source code is open source, it is hard to prove that the servers are running the source code that’s published, and we know they have admitted to having source code they don’t publish for anti-spam purposes.

      But you could take the signal server source code and stand up your own signal servers today.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          If your going to run a independent signal server cluster, you will also need to modify the client applications to connect to your cluster.

          You probably would find the molly developers happy to accept a push request to have some configurable backend selection.

          Session demonstrates this is possible.

              • zShxck@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                I don’t know man, seems to me XMPP is more secure (unless you trust Signal) and simple to use because you have to jump less hoops

  • DavidGarcia@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Molly should integrate Monero, the way signal has integrated their shitty Monero fork. Then I can finally buy molly on molly on Molly.