Je ne sais pas si c’est une blague, mais c’est un peu inquiétant.

  • leftascenter@jlai.luM
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    24 days ago

    Alors, pour tester, je vous propose:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_and_fact-checking. Vs.
    https://grokipedia.com/page/Wikipedia_and_fact-checking

    Un des paragraphe est très éclairant:

    Co-founder Larry Sanger has argued since 2020 that the platform exhibits a pronounced left-wing slant, attributing it to the exclusion of conservative viewpoints via policies that deem non-mainstream outlets unreliable, even when they report verifiable facts overlooked by establishment media.[89] This is evident in the Reliable Sources guideline, which prioritizes legacy media—often critiqued for institutional left-leaning tendencies—over primary data or alternative analyses, effectively blacklisting sites like those affiliated with the Daily Wire or Breitbart unless corroborated elsewhere

    • pseudo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      Français
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      legacy media—often critiqued for institutional left-leaning tendencies

      Ah bon ?

      • Niquarl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        Français
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        Oui enfin ils veulent BreitBart et DailyWire comme sources plutôt, c’est comme listé fdesouche quoi. Y’a sûrement des articles qui sont tout à fait correct mais voilà quoi…