• rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean that’s all I can really do.

    Unfortunately when my bank or other critical institution rejects Firefox for failure to use attestation, I can’t even do that. I’ll be forced to use Chrome. Firefox would have to adopt WEI to remain compatible. In that case I can use Firefox, but it would be the same as using Chrome.

    I’d say the monopoly Google has with Chrome is way more threatening than in the early 2000’s with MS and IE. That threat resulted in an anti-trust lawsuit, but not a peep from any government about the destruction Google is doing.

    • Contravariant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not much you can do about institutions you have no control over, but surely you could go to a different bank?

      Assuming there is a bank that doesn’t use this of course.

    • honk@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I‘m old so i actually remember this but I‘m old so my memory might be shit but wasn‘t the lawsuit about the fact that microsoft shipped IE wirth windows as a default browser and not about it being too dominant?

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’d say the monopoly Google has with Chrome is way more threatening than in the early 2000’s with MS and IE. That threat resulted in an anti-trust lawsuit, but not a peep from any government about the destruction Google is doing.

      Took the words right out of my mouth. I don’t even know that eu cares. Google is as evil as everyone feared if not worse. Apple is pretty bad too, not even allowing any browser but their own on mobile. People don’t realize it, but browser choice is actually a huge deal when it comes to causing damage to society (or protecting it)