ugjka@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-211 months agoAI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, Judge Says In Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pausewww.hollywoodreporter.comexternal-linkmessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1146arrow-down16cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.orgtech@kbin.socialtech@kbin.social
arrow-up1140arrow-down1external-linkAI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, Judge Says In Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pausewww.hollywoodreporter.comugjka@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-211 months agomessage-square52fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.orgtech@kbin.socialtech@kbin.social
minus-squareAKADAP@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·11 months agoYou own the copyright of your photo, AI flat art has no copyright, therefore the only copyright is yours.
minus-squarePipoca@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 months agoWhen you copy a public domain work, you can copyright your original contributions. So, for example, if you create a picture book of hamlet, you’d own the layout of the text on the page, but not the text of hamlet itself.
You own the copyright of your photo, AI flat art has no copyright, therefore the only copyright is yours.
When you copy a public domain work, you can copyright your original contributions.
So, for example, if you create a picture book of hamlet, you’d own the layout of the text on the page, but not the text of hamlet itself.