• 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Curious if anyone here is still finding a need for X network in their day to day lives?

    I was never big on Twitter so had no trouble leaving when Elon bought.

    • xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mainly use Mastodon now but sadly, my country’s public institutions (such as meteorology and seismology) have no presence in the fediverse. There’s also a particular fandom I follow that mainly interacts om Twitter.

    • AaronMaria@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I was only lurking but it was usefull to find out why a train is delayed and stuff like that.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Google takes away our ability to block ads. Elon takes away our ability to block content. HP takes away our ability to print with ink we purchased, unless we also pay a subscription. Adobe takes away our ability to own software. Interesting world…

    • grue@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Everything you mentioned is simply a subset of “[corporation] takes away our ability to own property” (i.e., trying to usurp our fundamental property right to control our computer). You can also add Apple and John Deere “right to repair” to the list, along with automakers trying to lock capabilities of the machine we already payfor behind paywalled subscriptions. It’s all the same underlying issue.

      Make no mistake: corporations are waging a war on the public’s right to own property, and we’re going to be forcibly returned to serfdom if we don’t start fighting back.

    • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Luckily there are alternatives to all of these.

      Duck duck go can replace Google search. Dropbox can replace Google drive. Firefox can replace Chrome.

      Mastodon replaces x / Twitter

      Go buy a brother printer instead of HP

      As far as Adobe, we do have photopea… The rest are harder.

      • cowbellstone@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Illustrator → Inkscape

        Lightroom → Darktable/CaptureOne/Rawtherapee

        They may need some getting used to if you come from adobe, but they are all very capable.

        • Armok: God of Blood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Inkscape doesn’t support typeface tracking which is a problem for me. I use Affinity Designer, which isn’t free, but also isn’t a subscription model.

        • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          As far as Brother, that appears to be an optional service. Our business has a contracted printer rental and service because the damn things are so expensive to keep running. Our old office printer used to break down all the time under light usage. We had the maintenance tech out at least 1-2 times a month.

          • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s an optional service for now (hopefully forever), but I can see them go the required route, as so many others have gone, and I wouldn’t even be surprised

  • NeonPayload@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Elon’s done with people blocking his shit takes. You will be forced to see the bitcoin scams no matter what!!!

  • Hiccup@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Getting rid of the block function is like trying to run email without a spam filter. Elon musk/ Twitter was already out of control. Now they’ve completely lost their minds, even more than they already had.

  • spiritedpause@lemmy-u6723.vm.elestio.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    To be fair, Musk said you’d still be able to mute users, which means you wouldn’t see any of their posts or replies, but they can see your posts.

    It’s like you’re shadow banning them from your own app experience lol

      • spiritedpause@lemmy-u6723.vm.elestio.app
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah but with blocking, the user is made aware that they were blocked and can then try to circumvent it by making another account and whatnot. With mute aka “personal shadowban”, the user isn’t aware they were muted and will just keep using that same account to harass, not realizing that their target isn’t seeing their crap.

  • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Wait, so are we still calling it Twitter to protest the stupidity that is the name X, or what?

    Even if it’s a dumb name, it’s still correct.

    • LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m still calling it Twitter because it will piss off Elon Musk if everyone keeps calling it Twitter and I think that’s funny.

  • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Honestly I think the future of the internet is in the hands of a few US judges, not billionaires who own these platforms.

    Once Section 230 hits the courts, the entire way the internet works could get flipped onto its head.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Oh gosh, I just started typing out a response. The. Started sourcing and realized this would take me a ton of time. There are a lot of people way more educated on this, especially the actual potential legal outcomes if this is tried.

        I am going to wait to see if someone more knowledgeable chimes in before going through the effort of making a well sourced and researched response.

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Well I apparently wasn’t paying attention and the case that most were sweating about was settled in the Supreme Court earlier this year. Gonzalez V. Google.

            But there are a number of worrying bills introduced to Congress recently like the CASE-IT ACT the See Something, Say Something Online Act of 2023 and a handful of others, with more being actively discussed.

            There is also this case that seems destined to go to the Supreme Court. I think some worry that eventually if congress doesn’t rewrite the laws the SC will feel the need to. Laws have finesse, SC decisions generelly have larger impact as they unravel a bunch or interconnected laws until new legislation is passed. A court decision could overnight mean everyone who hosts content is then liable, I don’t think I have to explain to see how that will go sideways for any smaller players on the web.