• 6 Posts
  • 146 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 4th, 2023

help-circle












  • DidacticDumbass@lemmy.oneOPtoLinux@lemmy.mlBack to linux!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Everything you typed out was a painful rediscovery on my part. I basically had to ignore my principles at every moment, but using Windows eventually became too gross, I had to get out.

    For the money I spent experimenting with proprietary software, I could have donated to projects making the alternatives.

    This is not a lesson I will need to learn again.


  • DidacticDumbass@lemmy.oneOPtoLinux@lemmy.mlBack to linux!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yes. The cost is reasonable, and think it is worth it!

    Right now I am using Tracktion Waveform, but I do not love it.

    I am looking at Reaper, and I do like the workflow, but the way it loads plugins puts me off. Not horrible, I just need to do extra work to make it work.






  • In principle, anthropologically speaking, the depth and breadth of data that has been collected is at its face outstanding and valuable. The full range of human experience is documented. What can be learned if it were studied would perhaps help save the world.

    Unfortunately, that “public” data is only available to the companies that harvest and buy it, not to the world at large. Not unless you are already in the shit that is collecting information on you

    To echo what other people have said, any benefits of public data is immediately squashed by the heinous abuse of power that comes from not protecting privacy.

    Information is freely given by those who care about the world and want to see it improve. No need to take away human rights for that.



  • For sure that is a limitation of an LLM. I was hoping the capabilities of Google or Bing would overcome that with extended formatting.

    I am ignorant of the ownership of Opera, so I will reserve judgement. I will say that the browser is great, despite its problem foundation.

    That is an awesome usecase. ChatGPT lets you get niche and weird, which isnwhere it is most productive.

    ChatGPT has the issue that it has no date beyond September 2021, which is not typically an issue.



  • I get that too drom Bard sometimes, but it is for specific queries. I think the key is working on the prompt until it gets it. Sometimes you need to start over with a new chat.

    Bing does not work like ChatGPT despite having the same base, even in creative mode. No idea why. However I like creative mode when I don’t just dont want to see links embedded. I also love taking advantage of free Dall-E.

    Bard is great for anything that can be put into a list or chart, like comparisons. Literally put in a chart.

    I am dissapointed in that I have not been able to get a single mathematic equation produced (like famous ones), but I know they can?

    If you get the chance and willing to download a full ass browser, Opera has Aria, which is like the cleanest version of ChatGPT I have seen. Just the formatted answers with hyperlinks are worth it. It is good. It is hard to explain, but Aria mostly just works. It is closer to Bard in responses, and does what you want out of Bing without messing with convo styles.

    Whatever prompts that Bing put for the convo style may be messing with the results.

    All things said, I switch between them often, depending on my needs. It takes some time but I have built my intuition of which one will give the best response for the prompt, but I often just search the prompt in all of them.

    Anyways, I hope you find more success using them!