old children’s film Bear

1998 British or 1988 French?

I’m sick of “Cocaine _______”. What, wolfy’s gonna ask to borrow €40 I don’t have?

Give me Heroin Ghost who shoots up to feel alive or LSD Tree Frog who wants to know what people keep licking him.

Damn. I’ve found evidence A New Hope (along with Empire Strikes Back and Revenge Of The Jedi) were released on Video8, but I haven’t yet been able to find evidence Enter The Dragon got a Video8 release.

Can anyone find evidence of Enter the Dragon being released on Video8?
The one source I have found doesn’t list it.

I really don’t want the answer to my question to be “Star Wars”. ☹️

How do you even research this?

I take a guess and then see how many formats for that guess I can find. It helps to know alot of home video formats I can check against.
Tell you though it isn’t easy because search engines have noticeably began to suck donkey ass of late. All the skills I’ve developed have turned worthless as searching no long works the way it did a scant few years ago.

I would wonder if there’s a Bollywood film that meets the same criteria and could be a strong contender?

I suppose it’s possible Deewaar or Muqaddar Ka Sikandar got a whole bunch of other releases (the second was popular in The Soviet Union) but other than that I don’t think laserdisc was ever released in India and that’s a whole format. Since some of these films released on near every format every one counts.

found evidence the first 3 Star Wars films were released on Video2000

Anyone know if Enter The Dragon also got a VCC release? I was able to find Exit The Dragon, ENTER THE TIGER on Video2000/VCC, but as you all know that is an entirely different Bruceploitation flick staring Bruce Li.

It existing on VCC does imply Enter The Dragon may well have been released on the format as well, and we could close the book on StarWars.

If the first movie had you thinking about, I dunno, Baudrillard

And then the fourth* had Niel Patrick cosplaying as Blanchard.

*which I still refuse to acknowledge

Thinking on it some of the Star Wars films might tie, but I really think it all comes down to if Enter The Dragon got that CBHD release. 🤔

Still seems it might be a tie as I have found evidence the first 3 Star Wars films were released on Video2000, but I have not found any evidence they were released on UMD.

“Lana and whats-her-face.”

Lilly. She’s the one who didn’t make anti-Black comments about Prop 8 in 2015. Lilly is also the one without culturally appropriative hair.

Some of that’s 00s CGI

I didn’t dig how computer-heavy the later films were either. Listen to the commentaries and extras where they talk about “digital inter-shot frames” and I turn Hank Rutherford: "They think that’s a selling point?

blended with too-clever writing and trite allegory.

I’m not sure if it’s “too clever” or “trite” because I don’t understand the films enough to tell. They certainly made a piece which required a great deal of extra-cinematic media viewing in order to “get” which I totally understand why people complain about.

That’s asking alot of your audience.

I’ve had my blu ray box set for years before the 4th film was ever made

A shame Warner Bros. and Lana had to go and ruin the release post-facto. 😕

If you wanted to understand The Matrix, you are going to have to watch all 3 films.
You will also need to see The Matrix: Revisited, The Matrix Reloaded: Revisited, & The Matrix Revolutions: Revisited.
You will of course have to watch all 9 shorts from The Animatrix.
You will need to read through The Zion Archives and watch The Burly Man Chronicles.

You’re going to have to get your hands on The Matrix Revolutions bonus CD-Rom.

You are going to have to play through Enter The Matrix, The Path Of Neo, and to have played The Matrix Online (servers for which shut down in 2009).

You Will need to see The Art of The Matrix and read The Shooting Script, as well as Vol. 1 and Vol. 2 of The Matrix Comics.

You’ll need to trawl through contemporary WhatIsTheMatrix as well as TheMatrix-Movie sites, and to have participated in contemporary Matrix Forums.

You’ll need to read Simulacres et Simulation in the original French, as well as Meditationes de Prima Philosophia by Renatus Descartes (that one it is ok to read in english, however)
You’ll also need to read Out of Control : The Rise of Neo-Biological Civilization.

You should also read up on Sophia Stweart’s lawsuit against The Wachowski Sisters, Warner Brothers, James Cameron, and 20th Century Fox.

You do not, in order to understand The Matrix, need to listen to the commentary track featuring Dr. Cornel West & Ken Wilber. instead, just watch the films regular and set up a loop pedal to repeat every 17-38 seconds “…in a Manichaean sense.” You’ll get the same effect.

I do however recommend listening to the LaserDisc commentary for the 1996 film Bound.

Finally, to truly “understand” the films, you’re going to have to take some dissociatives or hallucinogens (or even better both) and sip on a milkshake containing either reduced down pregnant horse pee or ground up goat testicles—whichever one works for you. I would not do both but I ain’t here to tell you what to do, @livus.

I have to admit I refuse to own anything past the first one.

Well if YOU wanted the view the highest resolution available on a format which never acknowledged the sequels, you are limited to the USA NTSC release of the film on LaserDisc (Hong Kong release was pan & scan).

The color timing of that release is different from later pressings however, closer to the theatrical release fewer scenes have a green tint. You may view that as an improvement.

There are two main reasons I think people “don’t like the sequels”.

The first—of which I do not accuse you—is transphobia. I don’t feel like reliving the trauma of looking up the details or the timeline, but as I recall before the trilogy was finished (but after contracts were signed) one of the sisters (I want to say …Lana) was outed by Buck Angel because he was mad his wife was cheating on him with one of The Wachowski Sisters (Lana?) People were mad this thing they like was created by at least 1 (they knew at the time) trans woman and even if they weren’t pushing outright hate they weren’t pushing as hard how awesome the films were anymore. I suspect similar would have happened with Fight Club if Chuck Palahniuk had been as openly gay as he is now back in 1999.

The second—in my view much larger—reason people “don’t like The Matrix sequels” is The Matrix at its base was a story which said, “What you think is, isn’t.” Anyone who feels disaffected or alienated can identify with the story.
The 2nd and 3rd movies, rather than being statements of what “isn’t” were statements of “what is”.
There is just a much larger group dissatisfied with a status quo than can be satisfied with any proffered replacement.
If the first film said, “Hey, are you hungry?” a bunch of people are going to feel and agree with that. If the sequels then said, “Alright, here’s some Hulbata.” Much fewer people are going to want that than originally agreed they were hungry, be it because they don’t eat animals, don’t like spicy foods, or want a spoon.
The people who want what the 2nd and 3rd films were offering are not going to notice any drop in quality from the first film, but the people who were hungry and salivating at the first film but don’t like lamb, are now hangry.

What? I’ve owned a Blu-Ray box set of The Matrix for years now. I live in the US.

Ah! but Matrix Resurrection was also released on Blu-ray (and DVD) and the parameters of this thought experiment was “Highest resolution release on a format which never acknowledged the existence of the fourth film.”

It is not “pointless nitpicking”. It is very important holding fast against allowing very determined forces of hate any foothold whatever.

I argue 3 things:

1. Irrespective the truth value of your claim you should not forward that position as there are forces of oppression who will latch onto any conceit of inherent differences between cis and trans people and claim that is the oh-so-important difference around which they claim the need to organize the oppression they are rabidly looking for excuses for
2. Your claim is not true under the commonly understood nor scientific consensus of what “sex” is
3. Even under your claim—which I consider simplistic and reductive—that sex is mere reproductive capability via sperm or eggs your assertion remains false

although it can be lost

No one “in casual conversation” considers someone “sexless” when they lose their gonads to cancer, nor do you know the “sex” of anyone to whose sex you have referred in going on high-90s percent of cases by your ridiculously narrow definition—I can’t imagine in those cases where you find yourself considering using either term you jam the person with a needle or jerk them off into a cup and bust out a microscope to check motility.

Finally I’m not sure what you hope to gain by your pedantry—they’re never gonna let you into the car.

Being trans myself, I will gladly tell you no one can change their biological sex yet

This is wrong.

“Sex” is determined by myriad inter-related physical and chemical factors which are absolutely capable of changing.

The view you are adding whatever credence being trans gives you to the discussion not only is incorrect it is adopted and propagated to back-justify oppression.

Do not do that.

A woman who was assigned female at birth and later lost her uterus to cancer wouldn’t stop being referred to as “female, late 40s” when her chart is being filled out by EMTs. The distinction you are attempting to hold up is meaningless to how “sex” gets used socially and epidemiologically.

the CG didn’t age as well.

Disagree. Goes for hyperreal without the whole “Fuck your concept of reality; this is what ‘real’ is now and you can’t afford to depict it.” found in everything disney!Marvel has ever done.

Also, it’s not “Ow, my eyes” shitty like Renaissance.

Now I want there to be a thrilling ultraviolet movie.

There is.

Recently, Oklahoma always wins

Are they allowed to just always do that Rodgers and Hammerstein number each year or are they forced to switch it up?

The objective metric is how high and long you can draw out notes.

Doesn’t that unfairly favor states at higher altitudes?

😒

If you have a couple of Alexa devices

…then you have a couple too many. Why do you want Jeff Bezos listening to your fuck?