I keep forgetting that that’s an option
I keep forgetting that that’s an option
I’m most interested in the Dinosaur Quiz.
The problem with hearing when a note isn’t right is that by the time you hear it you’ve already played it…
As someone who could never get used to just kinda eyeballing where a note is supposed to be, I strongly disagree about the trombone.
I mean, it would probably be a good opportunity for a handful of really rich people to further their control and ownership globally…so as long as our billionaire overlords value human life over their own personal power we should be good.
This would explain the other article I saw about a US-Clooney $20 billion arms deal.
No clue? Somewhere between a few years (assuming some unexpected breakthrough) or many decades? The consensus from experts (of which I am not) seems to be somewhere in the 2030s/40s for AGI. I’m guessing accuracy probably will be more on a topic by topic basis, LLMs might never even get there, or only related to things they’ve been heavily trained on. If predictive text doesn’t do it then I would be betting on whatever Yann LeCun is working on.
Perhaps there is some line between assuming infinite growth and declaring that this technology that is not quite good enough right now will therefore never be good enough?
Blindly assuming no further technological advancements seems equally as foolish to me as assuming perpetual exponential growth. Ironically, our ability to extrapolate from limited information is a huge part of human intelligence that AI hasn’t solved yet.
GPT-2 came out a little more than 5 years ago, it answered 0% of questions accurately and couldn’t string a sentence together.
GPT-3 came out a little less than 4 years ago and was kind of a neat party trick, but I’m pretty sure answered ~0% of programming questions correctly.
GPT-4 came out a little less than 2 years ago and can answer 48% of programming questions accurately.
I’m not talking about mortality, or creativity, or good/bad for humanity, but if you don’t see a trajectory here, I don’t know what to tell you.
This is very much the type of case that settles out of court for an undisclosed amount of money.
It’s an important lesson for this generation of graduates: robots aren’t ready to take your jobs…but we’re pushing it through anyway.
At that point you might as well just do it to the screw instead and use the normal screwdriver.
Hey I found this cool post from that guy you’re quoting.
This is just the plot of the Black Mirror episode Hang the DJ.
The company is offering affected users a 30 percent discount on a new Ecobee thermostat, valid for up to 15 thermostats.
…
whatever the hell ‘X’ is supposed to be
It’s the social media company he founded, obviously.
Or, if you’re trying to make it more directly comparable to 17 million (because humans aren’t great at implicitly comparing that many zeros), that would be 56,000 millions. It’s not how we normally say it, but 17 vs 56,000 feels different than 17 million vs 56 billion.
Which is why AI should tell end users “I don’t know” more often.
If you feel this is a simple solution, I strongly suggest you write up exactly how you do this and make yourself a billion dollars.
How I expect this to go:
US: “You really shouldn’t do that”
Israel: “Ok, thanks for the consult” *war crime noises*
It’s got flavah