Check this article:

https://cryptpad.disroot.org/pad/#/2/pad/view/qQG0ryE6n8EnZSTgCLMd4m87I7hEOoOkokkPPCj+lDs/embed/

Someone made article abt it: https://cryptpad.disroot.org/pad/#/2/pad/view/qQG0ryE6n8EnZSTgCLMd4m87I7hEOoOkokkPPCj+lDs/embed/

NewPipe Sponsorblock, LibreTube (Android) and FreeTube (on Desktop)

Never had any issues 🤷‍♂️

They maybe probaly also find out over any other way, so…

Thank you for sharing! I checked it out. It’s basically a random Mix of a bunch of different Firefox Forks, I wouldn’t recommend it for normal users or people who want the best privacy they can get with Firefox, is better than the Vanilla Firefox ig, but I don’t see any real sense using it.

Signal minimizes metadata, they don’t store it and encrypts everything, phone number isn’t a issue as long you don’t need anonimity, not everyone have to like federation and there are a lot of third party Signal clients which works perfect and they are allowed, like Molly.

Ente.io is recommended by many, but never used it myself, since I don’t need.

So after we mentioned this, let’s take a look at all Mozilla’s bad sites.

Sussy comment. 🧐

Sure 👍

Brave itself also don’t recommend there “private Tab with Tor” over the Tor browser, they said as far I remember in a blog post that u still should use the Tor Browser for anonymity

It’s depending on the extension and what it does. As long it’s only for the connection and rly does not anything else it shouldn’t.

Hardened Firefox has better privacy protections, while Waterfox is more like a browser focused on customization, design, performance and privacy without a lot of breakage. So it’s a good browser for “normal” people, but if u want smth more secure try smth like LibreWolf.

No? Please inform yourself better, electron based applications aren’t the same like a web app in a chromium based browser with a bunch of extensions, but okay.

A quote from the Whonix Docs:

"The following guide provides a higher security and privacy standard than relying upon online services such as ProtonMail or Tutanota, that promise “encrypted email” in transit or storage. Online systems can still be broken by an attacker capable of exploiting JavaScript flaws or undermining certificate authorities that provide encryption certificates for websites; see Webmail. Further, online providers can be hacked or coerced by adversaries to provide access for extended periods. " This is about Online Email Clients, but it also counts for Web Apps.

Signal is your way to go, so was it for me.

Which has it’s reasons, since Web apps are very insecure.

The typewise was incorrect and confused me for that reason, thx for explaining how he meant it.

Is not depending on how many is rather depending on which, but the quote less is more still counts. So basically just as less as you can and you feel comfortable with.