Was trying to be a sport and use GPT5 exclusively to write a python script that I could have whacked out in about 2 hours. The task was simply authenticating to an on-premise instance of sharepoint, reading a list of folders and documents recursively, authenticating to a cloud instance of confluence and recreating the structure as confluence pages while converting every docx to a confluence page and generating a link to the other ones.

After 4 hours of correcting and babying it it managed to successfully authenticate and parse the file and folder structure, but didn’t implement any of the conversion and linking logic correctly. I know gpt 5 is not geared towards coding, but it’s the only thing my company has (copilot) and I had to spoon-feed it on details for the auth mechanism and parsing for example so much so that it would have need easier and faster to just do it by hand.

If they’re really super fans the feedback is literally worth nothing for making the product appeal to a wide demographic. Some people (and I know this might be a shock) are not “fans” of a company or product. They want something usable.

So you mean like Mullvad always had?

Oh, I guess I’ll look into it then. Thank you for writing it up!

Thanks for the clarification. In the face of modern debates there is only black and white - if you’re not like us, surely you’re like them. I don’t find it cool that they support right ideologies.

I’m against it and I will keep it in mind for future consideration, but supporting the right surely is not the extent of the things they have done or what they are actively doing.

Where there’s light, there’s shadow and the message for right to repair and their exemplary designs for repairability also has an impact on society as a whole.

I can find it shitty that they support people who I disagree with ideologically and great that they make repairable and sustainable products.

To be honest i just read some abbreviations and terms i dont understand and I really do not have the time to go down the rabbit hole.

I just wanted to add a viewpoint to the discussion that the potential commercial target group larger is than the bubble in which some of the people here seem to be. I find this legitimate.

Here‘s my take as a relatively tech savvy guy with no introspective into the Linux scene and its political affiliation: I’ll buy framework products because of the repairability and upgradability as long as I can run whatever I want on it.

Most consumers that are sustainability minded (like myself) have no clue what hyprland or omarchy is.

I’m sure it’s a big deal within a small niche but the average consumer won’t know or care.

Cool, won’t buy anymore - well, technically I got my company to buy genuine boards and modules from them. Not anymore.

Giga Chad move

Finally a company with great service and ethical standards!

Same thing. It has to be barely thick enough to stop a predefined caliber weapon. And made of the cheapest possible material that still makes the armored vehicle mobile. Equipping armies is kind of expensive.

It generally means the cheapest option with the simplest possible operation that does the job well enough.

I don’t really see a use case for it on calibre. Maybe others are more creative than I am and can tell me what they would use it for.

As far as I see it on the release notes it is completely optional and nothing gets loaded until the Provider is defined and activated so it’s peachy for me.

I still remember the huge Protests to stop TTIP and CETA for weakening Food safety Standards and consumer protection in the EU. I don’t know the contents of the current agreement, but i guess that time, big Corporate interests and the big orange pedophile pushed it through…

I don’t think so. My kid likes the stories though :)

I use it to have it write stories of our cats and an imaginary cat having adventures with a princess for my kindergarten kid. It’s really good at it :)

deleted by creator

ARTE is amazing

Florida Man strikes again!