Don’t flush kitchen tissue though, it doesn’t disintegrate as toiletpaper does.
Don’t flush kitchen tissue though, it doesn’t disintegrate as toiletpaper does.
I thought I smelt something funky when reading that bait.
They might be printed on there, but as long as it looks like it has wifi (pointy units or the wifi symbol on your phone), people will buy it.
802.11 isn’t anywhere near common knowledge. That’s why it was named WiFi and trademarked to begin with.
Even worse, the CVE is effectively “if you use the package wrong, you get weird results”.
The affected method has signature function isPrivate(ip: string): boolean
. Passing in a hex number is not a string, and a method (toString
) exists for this.
The former, unfortunately.
“you’ve seen our war crimes, now you’re no longer welcome here”
As if you’d go be a tourist in a country, just after you’ve seen solders of said country commit, or politicians and citizens actively defend war crimes. Plenty of pretty cool other things to see.
The EU is could very much send them right back where they came from, but they don’t
That’s only for the war refugees. Sending people back to, say, Eritrea, would mean they’d be executed for leaving the country (which is illegal there).
Those only represent a tiny fraction of the immigrants though, and they’re not the ones “taking all the jobs”, that’s the worker immigrants.
For DNS and DDoS protection that wouldn’t directly be an issue.
For caching it would be breaking. You cannot cache what you cannot read (encrypted traffic can only be cached by the decrypting party).
Any forum with a decent UI is a reddit clone now?
The ICC in The Hague will probably bar tha- what? they don’t recognise that court? Oh well.
Good luck over there.
You don’t have to be PCI compliant for stuff like bank transfers or other forms of payment. Credit cards aren’t the default payment method everywhere.
Maybe it’s pay on pickup, or just a simple mail with sepa wire transfer instructions.
Also, the PSP can still use JS but your site still doesn’t need to have it. Services like Mollie and Stripe offer checkout environments they host, meaning you still don’t have to use JS on your site.
You can’t get around JavaScript, it’s impossible to build a functioning online store without some kind of JS.
Well, sure you can. It will just be a pain to use for your users, especially when validation comes into play.
But a simple list with an “add to chart” button really won’t need any javascript.
The posts aren’t constraining the information though. They’re effectively advertisements linking to the information (advertising they have info for you to read).
The information itself is public and freely accessible.
You don’t. They’re usually posting awareness campaigns that link to government sites.
I’ve opted the example to elsewhere, but they’d be like “bought a house? Find out how the taxes work on (link)”
the worst are the black and one always looking for troubles
BLACK AND WHAT!?
fine. keep your secrets.
No, the title is subjective. It would be something like “court upholds fine”, nof “not hear out a party” since there’s often no room for a defence.
Highest courts are usually acting upon a “this judgement is faulty, because they didn’t allow x” or “… didn’t consider y”. Not “… they disagreed with my opinion”.
Yeah, this is likely something that’s configured on an OS level to talk to some server when being sold.
However, note that SIM cards can have a flag that might enable this app (given how much power sim cards have over phones)
Note: no source, just assumptions
Edit: second note: this app isn’t present on my EU OnePlus Nord.
I work as a bartender in a live music venue in the Netherlands.
We, just like most festivals, used to always remove the caps from the water bottles, citing safety concerns (people would drop the bottle when empty but put the cap on, which is a nasty tripping hazard).
So a company started to make bottlecaps that clip to your pants, and most water vendors used a single size opening, which made this feasible. People held on to their cap, and could pause drinking.
Then water companies started to attach the cap to the bottle, to prevent litter, and the government issuing a mandate requiring us to charge per plastic unit.
So now we leave the caps on, but as guests return about 95% of bottles and cups to the bar (buying a drink without having a cup adds a 1 eur plastic surcharge), the safety hazard is basically gone.
As a bartender, I’d very much prefer bottles of water to cans. It allows guests to drink at their leasure, they’re easier to transport and can’t cause as much harm as a can (either by throwing or when squeezing it).
They are slightly visually less appealing than a cool can though, I’ll give them that.
Rinsing your dishes before putting them in the dishwasher is actually a good idea if the dishes are very dirty though…