C’est possible, je serai curieux de voir le résultat aujourd’hui, car j’ai l’impression que le train continue d’augmenter plus vite que le carburant (mais je ne suis plus autant les prix de l’essence donc ça vaut ce que ça vaut)

En gros aujourd’hui je n’ai plus de voiture, donc seul le train est utilisable pour rentrer chez ma famille. À l’époque c’était l’inverse, le lieu où j’étais n’était pas desservi par les trains. Mais aujourd’hui, pour avoir fait le calcul sur un truc similaire, avec ma compagne on paie environ 250 euros pour un aller retour en train paris bordeaux sur le week-end (avec cartes avantage, billets pris environ 2 semaines à l’avance, évidemment 2e classe), et le même trajet avec la Toyota yaris hybride que j’avais prenait bien sur plus longtemps mais me coûtait beaucoup moins cher (prix des carburants de 2021 certes, je ne les connais plus aujourd’hui)

Je vis à 2h de TGV de ma famille mais je les vois moins souvent que quand ils étaient à 4h de voiture ( avec pas de train possible), et c’est uniquement à cause des prix que je ne peux pas me permettre… Et qui ne font qu’augmenter

The diapsid part is very likely indeed, as fossil skulls of early stem turtles do show some temporal openings ( https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110218-024746 ) The point is more where do they nest within Diapsida, more closely to the Lepidosauromorpha, or to the Archosauromorpha, and where precisely if within one of those clades. The point is that can’t quite be proven using only extant species, whether by DNA or morphological evidence. And concerning ML, the methodology is often criticised, not because it’s bad, but because it’s opaque and thus it is difficult to justify and understand as a process

In phylogeny, genomic is just another tool. The point is that turtles are os course animals, but they do branch off of different reptile groups if you look at morphological evidence (which includes fossil data) or at molecular (genetic) evidence (which only includes extant species). This is not something frequent, as usually molecular evidence tends to strengthen previous morphologically established evolutionary relationships. And even though molecularists are more numerous today, their methods are neither better or worse than anatomy.

Phylogeny is not as straightforward as some people make it seem, and especially molecular phylogeny tends to rely on abstract concepts that can’t always be backed up by biological evidence (I’m not saying it’s wrong, it’s very often very good, juste that a lot of people doing it do not understand the way it works, and thus can’t examine the process critically).

And so turtles’ origin are still very much an active debate!

I feel inappropriate near all the very universal questions here, but as a paleontologist specialised in some reptilian groups, the question would probably be “where the fuck do turtles come from?!” The thing is that fossil evidence points to different answers when compared to genetic evidence, and thez separated long enough from other extant groups that we keep on having new “definitive” answers every year

Not sure if it qualifies as nihilistic, but Upgrade (2018) definetely has a very unhappy ending

He was Education minister before this, despite never setting foot in a public school, and heavily criticised protesters during the very unpopular pension reform while he was already a millionaire at 25 even though he never worked a day in his life. But hey, nice for us that he’s young and openly gay !

Only in the souls like niche, but Iron Pineapple covers a lot of often unknown indie games in his series of steam dumpster diving (don’t be fooled by the name, a lot of the games are good)

Yes, and as someone who is probably close to a 5yo’s knowledge on the topic, I don’t know anything (or close to that) on either programming or other parts of being “tech savvy”. Thus me saying that coming on the ELI5 community and saying “yeah I actually want a very much not 5yo answer type” is not the spirit, I’d much rather like first basic answers, and eventually other comments going more in-depth, like we see in the majority of posts here

I meant the precision that OP already has knowledge in the domain and asks for more in depth elements

I’m sorry but doesn’t this go against this community’s concept of providing simple explanations for things?

Yes of course, and I’m all for it, I just hope it’s a first step and not the end

Very good start, but as a French I fear that it may not be complete until it starts to include the high speed lines (TGV) that are the most expensive but also the most competitive when trying to divert traffic from cars or planes

Le highlight de ma journée pénible c’est ouvrir lemmy sur la commu France pour voir un peu de chaleur humaine dans ces “bienvenus” distribués sans modération !

Ah yes, science with a very much peer reviewed study, right ?

Not too much techy, paleontologist here