If Norris were right and following the track limits makes for boring races, I still don’t think drivers being allowed to ignore the track limits should be the solution.
First off, F1 is F1 because of the track shapes. Change those, and you arrive at Drag Racing, Nascar etc.
yeah, weird that the same title sponsor of a team never won both.
I assume the overlap in sponsors is significant?
how is publicising stuff like this not market manipulation?
I wonder how you ever could “upload” a consciousness without Ship-of-Theseusing a Brain.
Cyberpunk2077 also has this “upload vs copy” issue, but doesn’t actually make you think about it too hard.
yeah, but it’s not nearly as good as it seems.
ion thruster with a tiny bit of extra thrust snd ISP because of fusion reactions.
It’s possible but is a lot more complicated with later switches.
First gen was super easy. I think current one needs a mod-chip installed to Boot custom Firmware (which you need for ROMs)
I believe sky mentioned that the jump-start sensors didn’t trip, indicating that he didn’t cross (or touch?) the line.
Basically he stopped far enough back that his movement did not leave his designated area.
But they also showed with what they will come for you.
If you outsource decryption from emulation, they can’t do it (this way) again
I don’t think so.
But maybe Emulators need to change how they work.
Externalize a small, relatively simple tool to decrypt the ROM.
and a complicated, actively developed Emulator, that can only read decrypted ROMs.
With that, the Emulator shouldn’t be attackable the same way yuzu was.
Oh, I mean there’s nothing there.
A Court Document shows that Yuzu got a lawyer and will answer within 60 days of 2024-02-27.
The Answer will be the interesting bit. It may indicate if they wish to fight, or if they deem it not worth the effort.
Curious if this will fix my one issue I have with Finamp.
I have some quite large playlists I’d like to listen on shuffle. Finamp doesn’t do that well at all. (It seems it only shuffles what it has cached or something, as it seems to shuffle “only” the first 100 or so songs. of 3000+)
But doesn’t store cleartext, does it?
Well, competition for Valve might not be the worst thing.
On the other Hand I’m not sure if we would have gotten vive or steam deck if valve didn’t have a money printing machine with steam.
I’m rather certain that most companies would be worse for consumers, with the level of monopoly (/market dominance) that steam enjoys
Was the theoretical case of FIA approving and “Formula 1” (FOM?) Not approving the one where they’d technically be allowed to race, but them racing would not be allowed to be broadcast?
I mean Teslas marketing here is totally predatory, and imho this is where they should be severely punished.
once it became kinda publicly known that Teslas “Autopilot” doesn’t mean hands off driving, they changed to Full Self Driving capability
If you are relying on T&C as a get out of jail free card for your safety system, then it isn’t a safety system.
That’s how every safety system works.
You define the necessary conditions in which it works, and guarantee (with testing and validation) that in those conditions it does its job.
Nothing works unconditionally.
The Conditions in this case are in fact, that it is an assistance system, and not a safety system, because everybody knows it can’t be relied upon. It probably works >99% of times, which just isn’t (nearly) enough for driving.
Then it should not be called “Autopilot.” The AI required to make real autopilot work does NOT exist now and probably won’t exist for decades.
Well, in Aviation, where I believe the term “Autopilot” is most commonly used, at least before tesla, an Autopilot is actually exactly what Tesla offers.
When everything is fine, it can keep the plane going.
If issues come up, it disengages and the pilot has to be able to receive full control
/e: also, waymo and cruise already have completely autonomous cars, which generally work.
Except that Tesla does claim that they’re autonomous self-driving. They’re even among the group pushing to be allowed to sell cars with no driver controls.
https://www.tesla.com/en_eu/support/autopilot
they really don’t say that. I mean they advertise with it, sure. But always when it actually comes down to it, tesla admits it’s an assistive feature that requires constant attention.
Autopilot, Enhanced Autopilot and Full Self-Driving Capability are intended for use with a fully attentive driver, who has their hands on the wheel and is prepared to take over at any moment. While these features are designed to become more capable over time, the currently enabled features do not make the vehicle autonomous.
and you get warnings source (or here ) when you first sign up, as well as reminders when the car detects that you don’t follow the requirements.
if it disengaged a few seconds before, the crash is still the fault of Tesla’s software.
I actually disagree, because it’s not self driving, it doesn’t actually claim to have any autonomous features. The driver has to be aware all the time.
The way all of this is worded when facing the public is… horrible, that’s true. But since the warnings once in the car seem to all be there, I’d say that’s more a false advertising issue than a “is your product actually safe?” issue.
Really interested in how this comes out, even more data would be interesting to me.
but isn’t ‘being pushed wide’ and ‘choosing to run wide’ arguable in practice?
in a battle for position, the one on the inside will take any space given.
Maybe this is the reason they get 3 free passes for these situations (running wide with no clear advantage gained)