![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/44bf11eb-4336-40eb-9778-e96fc5223124.png)
Probably get a different candidate.
Probably get a different candidate.
I mean that was the point of Macron’s gambit. Don’t let it wait. Strike while you’ve still got a chance instead of dragging out a loss. Its going to be interesting to find out if this works.
Yeah sure he is.
He doesn’t need a ceasefire. He can just stop withhold financial support to Israel and all of this madness ends.
He doesn’t care. He only cares that you believe he gives a shit about a ceasefire.
You seem mad bro.
U mad?
I love how much it tells us that your this mad about even the idea that you could be inconvenienced or annoyed by a protestor.
It tells us so much about you than you’ll ever be able to say.
Theirs no confusion here other than that which you were trying to make with your statement.
I’m just pointing it out so that its clear to others what you are doing: a rhetorical bait and switch.
They’re just idiots complicit in the system. They’d rather have genocide if it comes wearing the right party colors.
They don’t truly believe in protest or freedom of speech, but they themselves are also functionally worthless in this regard.
Their hand wringing can and should be ignored.
Biden is overseeing the slaughter of children in Gaza right now and these people are mad about books. If you are focused on some minor damage to books and not the point the protestor was making, you are the problem.
Did they shoot someone or are you trying to set up a false premise?
Cus it sounds and looks like you are setting up a false premise. They vandalized some books. No one got hurt.
You know who did shoot some one today?
Israeli’ troops. Israeli trooop shot someone today, that’s who is doing the shooting. Its Israel.
I mean its not like they bombed an aid convoy.
Also, you are now here, talking about it, so it worked.
It’s propaganda meant to string you along and give the sense that Biden is “doing something” or that there is some daylight between the parties on this thing.
Also, the first time the price of something rises in the 5 minutes it takes for me to get my shopping done and get to the checkout, I’m taking a shit on the floor.
I’m with you I’m saving my dump truck load for the conveyor belt at the register.
Imagine walking down the aisle, normal day, no thoughts about the prices or any of that.
Then one day you walk down the aisle but this time you forgot your phone in the car.
Different prices. Then some one walks is coming close from the other end of the aisle. The price changes. They walk past, nonplussed. A few seconds later, it switches back.
I don’t know where the Devil’s staircase leads, but I’m taking it.
Ok. I will now seriously consider moving over to proton. I can’t trust a for-profit buisness to stay true to its mission. However, Open-AI has shown that I can’t blindly trust a non-profit to do so as well, but its ‘towards’ being able to trust.
This scene smells like a mixture of stale Budlight and PowerBait.
If they don’t individually own the property but pay for upkeep and there is no landlord… that’s a housing cooperative, no?
Squatter mansion.
There and better and worse variants, but the fundamental issue I’m identifying is the tendency to want to believe ‘good stories’. I think it’s a profoundly human flaw, related to our evolution and history as a species that tells stories to transmit information. We believe a good story. It’s pleasurable to lose yourself in story. You remember good stories. But a story being ‘good’ has little and less to do with it being true.
While we’re discussing this issue in the light of conspiracy theories with no basis, I think the flaw extends to all domains of human life where communication and evaluation are necessary.
Early millennial. Depped into the Navy about 5 months after 9/11.