

Oh, this one’s easy the way I understand things work now.
He is both former AND current, so fire up the mint.


Oh, this one’s easy the way I understand things work now.
He is both former AND current, so fire up the mint.


Try switching to Parry Grip, some of it is OK and the catalogue is big enough they don’t really get stuck.
And just to show solidarity the other day my kid just kept 'teenage mutant ninja turtles’ing for what felt like a half hour without a single ‘heroes in a half shell’ to round it off.
We use silicon bags and magnets. You let the top of the bag drape over the side of the bucket(tub? basin?) and hold it in place with a few magnets. From what I can tell the results are the same for the steaks and meat we cook and none of the sketchiness from eating slow heated plastic.
The version I’m specifically using is Adhuard Home, which runs on a raspberry pi that sits between your home network and the internet. Basically just like Pi Hole. So it will filter the DNS queries on your devices, including smart TV.
One of the options for a blocklist was specifically labeled as Smart TVs, so I’m presuming that one would take the fuss out of watching the logs and choosing which requests to block. This list is likely available for pi hole too, so that feature wouldn’t be unique. I know sometimes these will also block firmware updates, so that’s something to watch for.
https://github.com/Perflyst/PiHoleBlocklist/blob/master/SmartTV-AGH.txt
Would anyone be willing to offer their opinion on a comparison with Adguard Home?
Last week I was upgrading an old pi hole installation and ultimately decided to switch for awhile. Found the wild card blocking on Adguard to be quite nice for the pop ups that point out you’re using an ad blocker.
But really the more technical details are a bit out of my wheel house, so if anyone could weigh in perhaps if with this new version one of them has clearly pulled ahead or they are so similar it doesn’t really matter?


Thank you for taking the time, the perspective is helpful. Same answer as everything else then.
Just be more stubborn than the problem. =)


Wow, I feel seen. Currently fighting this battle, any tips or resources you found helpful?
I think it’s the index(?), aggregation, and order of operations I’m struggling with the most.


P for power?


Yeah I’m looking at it. And I found my receipt for the game from a year earlier so I couldn’t have used it. But it’s been so long and that’s not a trivial amount of money I’d want to be sure somehow before I wasted anybody’s time.


I got a Rocket League key from 2016, why in the world would anyone want that? Can I see if it’s redeemed without using it? If you want to broker for a cut send me a DM and we can start figuring out what’s in here, I probably have other things too.


Do you know any particular ones worth looking for? I remember swearing I had a code for Pico 8 and it was such a pain to wade through to find it. Might be worth the slog again to see if I had some valuable keys, been buying these things for awhile.
I’m not quite sure about this one. I think that the current design on the reverse is an issue. But the front doesn’t seem to break any laws.
I’m assuming they print these under subsection Y of 31 U.S. Code § 5112 - Denominations, specifications, and design of coins. Which pertains to these 250th anniversary coins.
The part I see mentioned in this thread frequently applies to a separate subsection (n) for a run of $1 presidential coins that has since ended.
If you just read subsection Y in a vacuum, they are good to go. This part at the bottom though says that the reverse can’t be a ‘portrait’.
So this isn’t really slam dunk illegal, but I don’t think that the draft of the coins reverse will make it to print. I would fully expect the front to come out just like that though based on my interpretation.
(aa)Standards and General Provisions for Circulating Collectible Coins Under Subsections (x), (y), and (z).—
(1)Prohibition on certain representations.—
No head and shoulders portrait or bust of any person, living or dead, and no portrait of a living person may be included in the design on the reverse of any coin under subsections (x), (y), and (z).