![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/ca9b0de3-205f-47ca-a620-5fbddb680695.png)
… you mean that thing we were talking about?
… you mean that thing we were talking about?
Apparently they’re up to three years now. Woo.
Good luck finding new ones in the US.
It takes emotion to make rash decisions based on reactionary feelings.
If you only do things because it feels right instead of what you’ve thought through and understood as a rational course if action… you’re doing the same thing as those who storm capital buildings cause an orange man told them to.
Wouldn’t that fall under the basic necessities part of OPs post?
How my actions affect other people.
Don’t worry, should it ever happen, there’s plenty of wannabe Napoleons who would be willing to step in to take over once theyre gone :)
The problem is, if they’re afraid they have the resources to do something about it. That much wealth can buy a lot of private armies. It also buys a lot of lobbyists.
It takes more thought and planning then reacting with emotion against them. That feeds their goals just fine.
And affordable.
“Don’t hate the companies, hate the people who lobbied for copyright laws… the companies!”
That’s a pretty popular opinion, actually.
Who does no. 2 work for?
Don’t worry, they’ll still use your data.
I prefer Stardew Valley
I’d imagine they pass overhead in a similar way to that total solar eclipses do.
That’s what post-its are for!
Everything is 99% grey area. If someone tells you something is completely black and white you should be suspicious of their motives.
But you didn’t say you had proof with your comment, you said it was probable. Basically saying its common sense that its proven.
Why are you getting aggressive about actually having to provide proof about something when saying its obvious?
Also, that seems to imply that locking up people for AI offenses would then encourage truly reprehensible behavior by linking them with those who already engage in it.
Almost like lumping people together as one big group, instead of having levels of grey area, means people are more likely to just go all in instead of sticking to something more morally defensible.
So… its just a claim they’re making and you’re hoping it has actual backing.
Do you know how long it takes to do everything?
Eternity. I doubt even with all time forever you’d be able to do everything. Our world is ever-changing, much less the wider universe.
The one stipulation I’d put on living forever is the ability to change with the universe. Who’s to say physics will even allow us to perceive reality in a few billion years, if we’re stuck the way we are?