I’ve never been fired. I honestly don’t know how people do it. Boss says “do X”, you do X with a smile, whether you like it or not. If you don’t like it, you start applying to other jobs while keeping your paycheck. Then leave, shake your boss’s hand and say it was great working with them (even if they were a POS), and forget about the whole mess with your new, higher paycheck.

I feel like these are kindergarden level skills. Follow instructions. Hide your emotions. Don’t let authority figures know you hate them as long as they have power over you. It’s not that complicated.

Considering that so many people are circumsized, and I have yet to meet anyone who says they are terribly unhappy about it, I’ll start off by saying that I really don’t think it matters either way.

However, I am uncircumsized, and American. I literally don’t think about it at all. I was bullied a lot in school - but never about my foreskin. I’ve slept with a lot of women - none of them have ever cared (the foreskin stretches away when you get hard, you can’t even see it).

Focus on giving your kid material resources and emotional support, and on setting a good example of being a happy, functional human. This just doesn’t matter

I feel like hiking and climbing equipment wouldn’t work well. At least where I live, tents, backpacks, etc would almost certainly be booked out by the homeless population indefinitely. That the homeless need camping equipment is a whole other discussion to have… but I don’t think most libraries would be equipped for the demand they would recieve.

I would not want to check out publicly owned rock climbing equipment. That sounds sketchy af. And I am a rock climber who knows how to inspect their equipment.

I drink coffee mixed with protein shake.

Then I eat more of a traditional breakfast around lunch time. I saute a bunch of veggies and a but of sausage (just enough to grease the pan) and then add some eggs, put it in a tortilla for breakfast burritos.

Even better: tax land exclusively.

For the first question - well, first of all, don’t spend too much time or effort writing this blurb. After all, you don’t even know this person - why waste your time writing a deep dive thinkpiece? If they like but don’t respond, I say something cheeky that explicitly opens the conversation.

For the second question: because people are lazy, or not really interested in dating apps in general but are just bored, or are bots, or a million other reasons. You’ll never know, and it doesnt matter. Write a message, throw it away, move on to the next one. Again, you two don’t know each other. You owe each other nothing.

As president, I run the executive branch.

1. Remove Trump’s cronies from positions of power in the executive branch. Re-hire the people he fired/layed off/quit.

2. Review currently effective executive orders. Cancel any which don’t directly deal with national security. Orders which might be supporting some significant aspects of large numbers of peoples lives will be ramped down slowly but predictably so no one suffers undue economic hardship.

3. Attend a bunch of boring meetings, occasionally decide the fate of Ukraine.

4. Respect the boundaries of my branch of government by not acting like a king and issuing a bunch of decrees without the agreement of congress.

5. Respectfully prod congress to reign in the executive branch’s power, implement reforms in the electoral process, and create term limits for supreme court justices.

Saying it is simple is a clear sign that this is a purity test.

They already do that.

As others said, the practical interpretation of OP’s idea would be that you just vote down all the candidates you don’t want to win. Then the least-disliked (read: most moderate and inoffensive) candidate wins. Good. This is what should happen. Government should be moderate and boring. In an ideal world the government would never be in the news because things are going well and nothing of note is happening.

You realize that most people dislike taxes more than they like functioning schools, right?

Yeah, the thing most people don’t get about cpr is that cpr mostly doesnt work. Iirc, there is about a 90% chance that if you have to start cpr, the person is going to die. It really is a last ditch effort.

dirigible?

I’ve heard construction is pretty rare in Boston.

Sure, why not? Different peoples bodies are different. I haven’t heard of this effect before, but if it is something you personally are noticing, I would just roll with it.

If you can’t do coffee, I suggest tea. In general I think most people should avoid energy drinks. Mostly because they taste gross.

That’s literally not true at all. Developed nations enjoy unprecedented levels of wealth these days, while incomes have consistently been rising in developing nations for decades. If it were true, then for every person we have now on Lemmy shit posting, we would need someone else living on less substance than our paleolithic anscestors did. We can certainly argue about the overall distribution of the wealth that has been generated - but it is blatently obvious that higher standards of living do not imply that someone, somewhere else must be living in poverty.

I mean, more realistically… ai can’t really write code reliably, but if utilized appropriately it can write code faster than a developer on their own. And in this way, it is similar to every other kind of tooling we’ve created. And what we’ve seen in the past is that when developers get better tooling, the amount of available software work increases rather than decreases. Why? Because when it takes fewer developer hours to bring a product to market, it lowers the barrier to entry for trying to create a new product. It used to be that custom software was only written for large, rich institutions who would benefit from economies of scale. Now every beat up taco truck has its own website.

And then, once all these products are brought to market, that code needs maintenance. Upgrades. New features. Bug fixes. Etc.

Idk, that was basically 90% of my last job. At least the ai code will be nicely formatted and use variable names longer than a single character.

“Queer people should be as miserable as the rest of us”

our existence is not up for debate.

Also, the current administration might have something to say about that

The ones arguing against those rights, are the ones being divisive.

Lol. Very “no you” energy

I mean, not all solutions need to solve all problems. Really the solution here is a carbon tax, penalizing the creation of CO2eq directly, rather than playing whack-a-mole with various contributing factors. Then, reform zoning laws and start improving transit/urban infrastructure.

The current sprawling state of US cities isn’t something that can be fixed very quickly. But ebikes can do a lot to fill the gap. Ebikes are fast and cheap to manufacture, are democratic, and provide timely transport in an ~15mi radius. Complimenting ebikes, city governments should implement BRT systems. BRT isn’t as sexy as trains, but it could be implemented in a month or two with basically no expense via paint and traffic signal programming. Beyond this, what would be amazing is a bus designed for rapidly loading/unloading ebikes, resolving the last mile problem at both the start and end of trips.

So your friends who live 30 miles from work could ebike to the BRT stop, jump on with their bike, ride across town, unload their bike, and ride to work. Or with the zoning changes, they could simply move closer to their work.

Or they could - get this - continue driving their current ICE vehicle until the built environment is sufficiently reformed. Or buy an EV which is designed to navigate the current auto-oriented landscape. That’s why the carbon tax is important. Ebikes and BRT might not work for all people in all situations. People need to be free to make their own choices about what works best for them, and that may very well be an EV. Certainly the more radical elements in this sub might hate the idea, but no one who actually knows anything about urban design thinks we’re going to be able to snap our fingers and get rid of cars overnight. The point is to make eco-friendly cities that make people happy - and forcing people to commute an hour via ebike in a Michigan winter isn’t going to make anyone happy.

But that doesn’t change the fact that for a great number of people (and an even greater number of trips) ebikes are not only an eco-friendly solution, but an economical and fun one.