I have a relatively new car thats already had an engine swap. Nicknamed “the wreck” or “Raset” in Swedish. No, it wasn’t my driving, the shop fucked up, long story.
My other car, an old Renault box van, hasn’t got a name. It looks like it does, but inspiration hasn’t struck yet and it might not ever.
To name a car, the car needs to deserve it, have personality. Not any old car gets named.
What other purpose is there for those flights? Making sure the Palestinians aren’t preparing to invade the British enclave on Cyprus?
I have no idea about the legality of sharing the info directly with Israel, but I would be very surprised if the US is kept out of the loop. If the US then shares that with Israel or not, I’ll let y’all guess. 🙄
Someone not having all that much of a garden or suspect that the plant will be gone before harvest if kept outside? Maybe?
Couldn’t agree more.
I’d say it is feasible, it is more about willingness to implement. My guess is also that many sites will probably request this or intentionally not working or working badly if off, so most people is gonna keep it always on because convenience, if implemented. It’s better than always on by default but not optimal. Letting randos on the internet control your HW is iffy at best.
I used to, but that’s not enough and that’s only for me anyway. To few people are doing it, so you can be easily identified because you do stuff like this. (See the TOR browser approach and their recommendations about changing the defaults) Many sites don’t like it so most people aren’t willing to do that or rather don’t care or know how to.
By Bowdlerizing/randomizing the data for each call (or site/session probably) instead, the data will still be ‘valid’, but not as traceable and would negate the need for such hacks that almost noone does and which also makes you stand out like a sore thumb.
It probably isn’t possible or at least not easy on Windows/Apple, so it would be a Linux only thing. Which is a problem too and opens up to Linux blocking or subtler “upgrade your browser to…” type errors.
There are certainly issues and problems with this I’ve not considered or mentioned. It is not a popular idea among the tech giants for one, and they’d do whatever they can to nip something like this in the bud.
I’m not really knowledgeable enough to say for sure, but this sounds like a privacy nightmare. It’s hard enough to keep browsers in general from giving up enough info to identify you even without cookies, but I can’t even begin to see how to stop this from leaking just about everything.
Direct HW access for browsers? Not a fan. What we need is a layer between the browser and the HW that anonymizes and generalizes the API responses instead. I get the increased latency would be directly opposed to what this is trying to achieve, but it’s a prize I’m willing to pay. It’s contrary to what every tech giant wants, which is an indication it’s actually a good idea. They aren’t our friends.
As a vixen I’d prefer a small rodent, but men are universally clueless it seems.
You are correct. If I gave the impression that it is a safe endeavour, I am sorry. It is safe IF done correctly, but it can get explodey if you fuck up bad enough.
Do your research, keep it small scale and don’t sell.
I you make your own, there is no risk for blindness. Blindness comes from methanol, not ethanol. If you use a yeast based process to produce the alcohol and then distill it, there is no way to accidentally produce methanol in that process. The cases where people get blind or die from moonshine stems from when the feds replaced moonshine with methanol to be able to make that claim and disrupt the business of organized crime during the prohibition. There are still cases now and then where people try to make drinkable alcohol from some industrial base and don’t know how to.
TLDR: Don’t buy, make.
Sure they are. It’s just that notifications are evil too.
So that’s were the inspiration for Ford Prefect came from.
This is a sure sign that the NSA have been reading everything encrypted with standard cryptos for quite some time but they see that the opposition (China in this case) is showing signs of catching up. Can’t have that, even if it means losing capability for themselves. They have other ways in so the drop in capability is not as big as one would think.
I personally wouldn’t trust anything but one time cryptos to be safe and I don’t trust any algorithm from that source to be safe. It certainly should be and it is very much in their and our interest to make sure that it is, but the possibility that they are trying to eat the cake and pull a fast one is frighteningly far from zero. It would be monumentally stupid to try because shit like that always gets out and that would jeopardize every system in the world. Stupid isn’t exactly in short supply these days.
That article almost hurt to read.
But for a glorious few moments you’d be in nerdvana. Worth it. Refresh rate will simply be calculated by how many electrons hit the screen per second, so not quite infinite. Bet the number is pretty high, though.
Right. So, it’s bad because… Nah, I got nothing.
“Son, always be a good boy, don’t ever play with guns, but I shot a man in Reno, just to watch him die.”
Folsom prison blues Johnny Cash
I must confess to not watching the vid either. 😃
This is known. Until key distribution is solved one time Cryptos remain unpractical for everyday use.
This is 100% initiated by Elon to sell trucks to the airforce and as a bonus project an image that the cybertruck is viable for something like that. It laughably isn’t and can also easily be tracked. Off road isn’t really possible either from what I gathered.
Hard to think of a worse vehicle for that purpose actually.