That’s my point exactly, Linux doesn’t come without sacrifice and few are willing to sacrifice anything for freedom
That’s my point exactly, Linux doesn’t come without sacrifice and few are willing to sacrifice anything for freedom
I’m going to tear out your spine like a wet noodle for putting that image in my mind
Let’s be honest, very few people who talk about how much they hate Microsoft will even consider alternatives
*cops pissed they have to follow due process
As an Asexual person don’t feel pressured to have it, you’re valid regardless of if you have it or not and which gender you have it with.
I don’t think the hands dissapear, tbh it kinda breaks immersion when you’re supposed to see the hands of the character and instead you see your own
I guess kinda like the PSVR2, if you have it already it’s amazing but if you don’t then don’t bother getting it.
Interesting but I doubt it’ll be a good PCVR headset
I meant Microsoft’s Xbox input method, absolutely nothing against x.org
Having developers pay a one time fee for dedicated servers that the players don’t need to pay for is amazing.
I wish, the first one still stands as the best controller imo but it still has so much that can be improved (USB C, dual thumbsticks and trackpads, two back paddles, improved haptics, better gyro, better ergonomics, etc).
I just hate the very concept of Linux being monetized. I don’t think it’ll happen and I don’t want it to happen.
Steaminput is a massive deal, it supports gyro, remapping, profiles, and extensive customization. XInput can’t compare and the epic games store relies on developers for everything. That’s the reason why I will always pick a Steam Controller over an Xbox controller.
This is why Steam is as popular as it is, they just release features that people like. Sure GOG doesn’t have DRM and Epic Games gives a bigger share to developers but Steam gives players what they actually want.
Fundamentally that doesn’t make any sense, unlike Apple or Google Linux can’t charge a percentage for subscriptions. Right now companies are getting away with not contributing any money to Linux, why would they magically start? Furthermore who would they pay? Not everyone uses flatpaks and adding paid apps/subscriptions would be highly controversial. Even if it did work the money made would be a tiny fraction of what android makes.
I am talking about businesses supporting the Linux desktop with software, not about the OS devs themselves.
What money is there in desktop Linux? Companies don’t support things without expecting something in return.
Finally, someone gets my point. Capitalism inherently makes products worse and more expensive, the flaw in your argument is you think it can ever be contained.
I acknowledge that, the rise has been absolutely incredible. However, I doubt it’ll reach above 10% (on the desktop globally).
That’s my point, people may complain but nothing else competes.