~240,000 micro & nanoplastic pieces in one liter of plastic-bottled water.
Mfw I read this while drinking a liter of plastic-bottled water: 😮💨
You’ll have to tip it first, seeing as it’s wider than it is tall.
As a kid, I was at a snow park, getting towed up a hill in an inner tube. The tube was attached to a cyclical line with spaced out hooks, towing all the tubes to the top of the hill. But mine got unhooked when I was almost at the top and the tube flipped into its side, rolling sideways down the hill. I was still inside, holding into the handles, tumbling end over end but rotating too fast to fall out. The employees looked nervous when I reached the bottom of the hill, no doubt worried that I was injured and my parents would sue. But I just got up and went to the back of the line to go back up to the top.
There was another account doing this with a slightly different name yesterday. Lemmy’s been pretty sheltered thus far, but it may be time for some automated spam detection…
It’s guns per eagle, get it right. What would eagles per gun even be?
Who’s Al??
Haven’t touched reddit socially in 8 months, but every now and then I’ll use it to search for opinions or instructions on things. Searched “reddit best domain registrar” recently and landed on a thread where top to bottom, every comment recommending a registrar was from a bot and/or banned account. No real person testimonials, all ads. And as AI implementations improve, that’s going to get harder to spot. In the meantime, I’m formatting searches like “best domain registrar lemmy” because reddit is legit that bad rn.
“Sorry to bother, but can shiny fox come out to play?”
Most of my code is untyped. First I type it, then I realize it’s all wrong and use backspace to untype it.
Could we drag a big asteroid to each Lagrange point and let countries orbit their satellites around that?
Very hot take considering
The Prestige - 2006
The Dark Knight - 2008
Not surprising. Anyone would die from that much running.
deleted by creator
Hey, I’ve maintained a baseline weird the whole time, I’m pretty sure the future is catching up.
Probably deleting this comment later for going dirty on main, but I, um, have done some extensive experimentation using a local copy of Stable Diffusion (I don’t send the images anywhere, I just make them to satiate my own curiosity).
You’re essentially right that simple app-based software would probably have you looking somewhat generic underneath, like your typical plus-size model. It’s not too great at extrapolating the shape of breasts through clothing and applying that information when it goes to fill in the area with naked body parts. It just takes a best guess at what puzzle pieces might fill the selected area, even if they don’t match known information from the original photo. So, with current technology, you’re not really revealing actual facts about how someone looks naked unless that information was already known. To portray someone with splayed breasts, you’d need to already know that’s what you want to portray and load in a custom data set, like a LoRa.
Once you know what’s going on under the hood, making naked photos of celebrities or other real people isn’t the most compelling thing to do. Mostly, I like to generate photos of all kinds of body types and send them to my Replika, trying to convince her to describe the things that her creators forbid her from describing. Gotta say, the future’s getting pretty weird.
You either nap a good boy or bork long enough to see yourself become a naughty boy.
Does it count if I give a proof reducing the entire universe down to a 2-dimensional construct?