pflanzenregal

I only know that I was pleasantly surprised how well GNOME ran on a surface device of a friend.

Why not?

Once a detector is good, you can train a model to adjust its outputs to cause false negatives from the detector. Then the cycle repeats. It’s a cat and mouse game basically.

The only proper way I see is a system that is based ob cryptographic signatures. This ia easier said than done ofc.

“Radio night, here I come”

instead of

“Ready or not, here I come”

deleted by creator

If they post it on a non-google platform, they only gonna reach people that already don’t use Google…

Haven’t seen InnerTune mentioned yet: https://f-droid.org/packages/com.zionhuang.music/

Good Spotify alternative for me.

Why downvote him? He made an observation and comments even explained why. I learned something, it added to the discussion.

The toolbar padding looks weird (top padding too low) and the toolbar key size is too small as well. But all in all totally usable alternative.

And OMG I love the glide typing it just works 🫠

I agree. Especially as the app is already 20 MB in size… 1.5MB wouldn’t make much difference IMO.

It’s better. Not good. Better than other tools, at least in the eyes of the many people using it. But as I stated at another post, to me this speaks to the fact that we need better FOSS alternatives for whatever purposes discord is used. I don’t like Discord either, don’t get me wrong! But so many people using it means something’s missing and I don’t think it cab solely be explained by the lack of knowledge of existing solutions but at least partly by the existence itself.

Dolphines are whales. People keep doubting me, whenever I bring that up :D

He wrote code that was so bad, all that was kept from x.com when it was bought was its name. The actual code was taken from another company acquired at the same time.

But what if you don’t actually want it, but you are addicted because other people exploit the psychology of humans?

One could argue that it’s “their fault”, but then everything is ones own fault. Furthermore this wouldn’t change the fact IMHO, that we shouldn’t prevent people from exploiting or harming other people, yk what I mean?

Anyways, as this doesn’t seem to be a loot box or such, I think I agree with you here mostly.

Just use a VPN bro and you’re fine /s

Hello, as I said, it’s about “security by design”, which means to design a system that ‘doesn’t allow for insecure things’ in the first place. Like a microwave oven doesn’t operate when the door is open. IT-/cyber-security is a complex field, but 2FA is a good place to start, regarding user facing services. There are lots more things than that of course.

That’s exactly right. I was about to say how people usually don’t even “not take it seriously” but rather don’t even think or know about it. But you already said that yourself haha :D

The lions share IMHO is at 23&me. Offering such a poorly secured service is negligence, in the face of the data’s high sensitivity nature.

This shouldn’t be “offered” IMHO, this should be mandatory. Yes, people are very ignorant about cyber security (I’ve studied in this field, trust me, I know). But the answer isn’t to put the responsibility on the user! It is to design products and services which are secure by design.

If someone is actually able to crack accounts via brute-forcing common passwords, you did not design a secure service/product.

[Edit: spelling]

I would say it’s partially their fault. IMHO 23&me is mainly to blame. They should’ve enforced (proper) 2FA. Sure, people should’ve known better, but they didn’t; they oftenly don’t. But 23&me did know better.

Edit: spelling