Because they want their voice chats to be monitored?

Where do you get all these Coca Cola flavours? I’m in Germany and have only ever seen vanilla, lemon, cherry and life (next to the default, light and zero).

Yeah I’m not saying hCaptcha is good. It just shows that new captcha systems can become popular, and that Google’s hold isn’t as strong as it may seem.

Private Lock also hasn’t been updated for four years :(

hCaptcha is catching on pretty quickly.

Does it say that both the front end and back end are proprietary, or just the back end? I’d be fine with a closed source back end

No third-party services

Support for alternative routing

(following link)

alternative routing requires us to use third-party infrastructure and networks we do not control

huh

Your comment kinda reads like an ad.

I do think it’s desirable. It’s unnecessary for users to keep track of which tool is best for which purpose if one tool can do it all. There’s no reason why one tool wouldn’t be able to; even in the worst case it could just automatically choose the best tool to answer your prompt, saving you the trouble of doing so.

A single tool isn’t going to meet all those needs yet

That browser hasn’t been updated in a year.

All 3 systems use openssl and get attacked using Heartbleed.

(And even if they don’t reuse even a single piece of code, attackers can still just use multiple exploits.)

doesn’t want to mess with what she is familiar with

That does make change difficult.

Is this standardized sizing for men’s clothes in the room with us right now?

I hope this gets ported to Windows. I use Linux, but many of my friends don’t and won’t.

I recently (two months ago) had to work with an Excel sheet which worked on OnlyOffice but not LibreOffice. So compatibility seems to still not be on par.

deleted by creator

Is the Shanghai maglev perhaps subsidized?

claiming the GDPR is good =/= claiming the GDPR is flawless

They didn’t say that either. Where do you get this idea from that they’re talking about (all) US news sites?

They said “American propaganda websites”. That may include some news sites. It may also not include some news sites.

The most you could infer from their statement is that only American propaganda websites violate the GDPR.

Of course websites exist that violate the GDPR and are not American propaganda websites.

But the vast majority of websites commiting severe violations of the GDPR that an average European encounters will be American propaganda websites.

(Believe it or not, Europeans don’t often visit websites written in Russian or Chinese.)