![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/d079498e-9608-4d74-9172-5371f8912ebc.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/7dd4c588-aff6-4089-ba5a-a138553ad93d.png)
I’ve only seen the sciencealert.com link, so that one.
It might be that I expect technical proficiency from science journalists, which might be a high bar.
Almost as smuuth as sharks.
I’ve only seen the sciencealert.com link, so that one.
It might be that I expect technical proficiency from science journalists, which might be a high bar.
15 days. Great. What’s the circumference? Oh, they didn’t give that either. “15 days” is still not a rotational velocity, it’s linear.
I’m not giving these folks grief for doing near impossible measurements, I’m giving the article grief for claiming a measurement was made, and then not stating said measurement.
I’m fine with even just an “order or magnitude” ballpark number. But again, they did not give us a rotational speed.
The same thing that’s wrong with saying I’m going 1250 rpm down the road. It may be correct, but doesn’t actually mean anything without more data.
They calculated it, and could only say “less than 25% of C” which isn’t even a rotational speed measurement?!? Get bent. If you don’t want to say, fine, don’t. But don’t tell me you’ve calculated something and then A) not give me that number, and B) give me a number that isn’t the number you calculated and can’t be used to determine the number you calculated without additional data that you also haven’t provided.
I’ve seen that Star Trek episode.
A taxi has a very expensive component - the driver. And a taxi doesn’t pick up strangers on the way to your destination.
Smaller (6 passenger) buses running autonomously. We’re not there yet with the autonomy, but there’s no reason to stick with one size of bus. Sure, keep big ones on major routes, but use smaller ones for small routes. Heck, make those routes on-demand.
Packaged in plastic? I can guarantee that any hydrogen that had been “infused” was long gone before it got to the consumer.
That’s his videos now. Get you to watch them to hype Crunch Labs.
Huh, I guess that answers that. Thanks!
Aren’t infant trunks non-prehensile at that age? Do they just fling it around until they can catch it in their mouth?
The disarming route:
You: Can I have a raise? Pest: What? I can’t give you one, I’m not your boss. You: Say that last part again slowly. [insert raise eyebrows here for emphasis]
Not me, but my wife said as a kid that the Incredible Mumford freaked her out when he’d have his accident.
Wait, hydrogen? After SWB, you mean.
Yup! Let’s account for all of it! Seriously! Let’s find the optimal lowest carbon solution!
Great. Is hydrogen powered construction and mining equipment common? No. So until it is, my statement stands. Concluding that all equipment is clean because it CAN be is daft.
Clean until you use a bunch of equipment to get it captured. The hydrogen might be carbon free, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t have a carbon footprint.
Convince me otherwise, but the only green hydrogen is from renewable energy powered electrolysis.
I would LOVE to know what, if any IP, patents, or tech came out of this whole thing. I’m guessing “not much”.
No more poop knife, you just bite it off.