Since Bart is now available in Europe I have both options now and problem of choice :) People who have access to both for a while, what AI tool do you mostly use?

  • noodlejetski@geddit.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    none, because 1. privacy nightmare, and 2. a glorified keyboard autocorrect isn’t a replacement for a search engine.

    • gelberhut@lemdro.idOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Both have option to turn off history saving. In this case they keep dialog for a short time only.

      Regarding glorified keyboard autocorrect… I see this a bit different.

      Anyways, thanks for sharing your opinion.

      • noodlejetski@geddit.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Both have option to turn off history saving. In this case they keep dialog for a short time only.

        I’m sure this will prevent Google/Bing from storing everything you type in there on their end for as long as they please.

        I see this a bit different.

        given how the very purpose of LLMs is to just create sequences of words that are statistically likely to follow each other in a sentence, and how there are countless examples out there of them hallucinating answers including non-existent court cases, or providing authors of articles with a list of articles they have not written and so on, I struggle to see it as anything else.

        • gelberhut@lemdro.idOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I already got that you do not found a use case - and this is fine. I asked for opinion of people who use these both tool and can compare

    • John_Coomsumer@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a bit close minded and reductive when you can see a large number is examples where these tools beat the shit out of search engines, and search engines have been on a precipitous decline in quality for years now. Not talking shit; the privacy concerns are very valid and i dont think there is anything at all wrong with an anti-ai stance in these areas, I just don’t want novices reading this and thinking these tools are “glorified keyboard autocorrect” when some near version of them is undoubtedly the future of both internet search and internet assistant.

      • Teppic@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not sure I fully agree. These tool are really ruddy brilliant at certain things (like writing or translating computer code, drafting certain documents) but they are poor at being factually correct. Unless / until they find a way to fact-check themselves I don’t see them replacing search, just complementing it.