• Rustmilian@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I had to add that because people like to read a title and jump to conclusions like this is some kind of random political article.

    • hypelightfly@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I find this type of information in video form to be insufferable. Just like putting something like “watch before commenting” in your title.

        • hypelightfly@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          What conclusion do you think I’ve jumped to?

          Also, transcripts don’t solve the problem of shit content designed for video. It’s the same script.

          • Rustmilian@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            What conclusion do you think I’ve jumped to?

            Not you, but others clearly have.

            Also, transcripts don’t solve the problem of shit content designed for video. It’s the same script.

            And? The Transcript shows you annotations to the sources. If you don’t want to watch the video or read the Transcript then go read the 48 different sources compiled to make the video.

            Too many sources to read & go through? Sounds like a you problem.

            shit content designed for video

            There’s your conclusion you jumped to right there.

            • hypelightfly@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              No jumping involved. I read the transcript, it’s shitty clickbait content. You’re being awfully hypocritical with your assumptions.

              I don’t disagree with the conclusions, the issue is with how it’s being presented.

              • Rustmilian@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                shitty clickbait content.

                No it’s not. You realize a video title can be true to a videos content without giving everything away right?
                You ever hear “Don’t judge a book by its cover”? This is it.