• TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why the hell would you do that?

    Looks like ~4000IU a week is plenty, even with no sunlight exposure.

    You’re looking at like 13x the recommended intake; that’s going to screw up your calcium levels eventually. And the stuff is cumulative, it’s not like eg. vitamin C, which is gone from your system a day later.

    My very strong advice would be don’t.

    If you’ve got a massive deficiency, follow medical advice.

    If you haven’t, then quit fucking with it.

    • Thavron@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Why the hell would you do that?

      I had to do exactly this after a blood test showed my vit D was so low they couldn’t accurately test it. It was to bring it back up to level, and now I just take a normal amount every day to keep it that way.

    • Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Sweden’s recommendations are 100 µg/day for adult, which is 4000 IU (IE) per day. Times 7, is 28000 per week. So you’re off by a factor of 7.

      Some tests have shown even up to 10000 per day is fine. But why risk it? While I’d not take OPs 40000 per week, because it’s too much in my eyes, it could still be save, but I’d personally not risk it. There’s no point in overdoing it.

      I take 5000 UI every other day, because I barely get any sunlight. Probably a bit too low but I’d rather not risk it.

    • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It is for some people. I currently need to take 100k iu/week in order to be on the low end of normal.

      I was on 150k iu, but I had to switch doctors. The new idiot didn’t believe me and just told me take an OTC pill a day.

      I left that guy. The next time I got checked, I was in the single digits. The new one didn’t really believe me either. Each winter visit I’ve been low and she just keeps adding another pill. I suspect I’ll be back up to 150k then.

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    Get a blood test. Excess of vitamin D may end up causing stones in your kidneys. If your levels aren’t low, there is no point in adding a supplement.

  • CreateProblems@corndog.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    When my vitamin D levels were tested low, the doc told me to take 2,000 IBU daily.

    ~7000/day seems quite high to me. But I’m not a doctor.

    I would consider if the cost of purchasing all this vitamin D - a lot of of which your body may be excreting rather than absorbing - is a worthwhile financial investment in your health. I don’t know anything about you, maybe it is.

    • PurpleTentacle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Unlike e.g. vitamin C, excess vitamin D isn’t really excreted. It’s stored long term and eventually causes hypercalcemia and kidney stones if persistently supplemented at high doses over a long time. OP’s dosage is above the “sensible if you never see the sun” range but not quite in the “dangerously excessive” range.

  • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Probably more wasteful than anything. Vitamin D3 is pretty safe, and that’s not a crazy dose for a serious deficiency. It’s probably worth getting tested for your level and dropping to about half that if you aren’t low.

    • Mothra@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Excess of vD for a prolonged time can get you stones in your kidneys. Hypercalcaemia