Will there be a pro version without in-app purchase like there was before? If I could avoid the in-app purchase I’d prefer it. There where weekly threads on Reddit when the in-app version failed to work correctly and I never had any problem with the pro version.

  • Ljdawson (Sync dev)@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Not planning to. Last year Sync for Reddit had issues with Google as they’re clamping down on apps that are similar from the same developer.

    • GiddyGap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      11 months ago

      Does that mean there’s only going to be a subscription based “pro” version?

      I was a Pro user on reddit, but I’m not really interested in yet another subscription, even though I understand that may be financially attractive for you. I’d be happy to make a one-time purchase, though.

    • EtzBetz@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      Will Pro become available as IAP, though? I’d maybe specify this. I did read this whole thread as if Pro was cancelled altogether.

    • serv@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Can you do a separate app that acts like a licence key, they way apps like FX Explorer does it? Or does that have the same (or other) issue?

      • limerod@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m in support of a separate pro version of the app. As a compromise, this could work, too. Though, I would prefer an app without any ad libraries whatsoever.

    • 「fleece!」@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Why do you think this is? Are they pushing for IAPs instead of pro/lite versions of apps? Do you think this is a good or bad move?

    • Ducks@ducks.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Probably a good idea, so many people gave you misdirected grief over that

    • httpjames@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      What was the point of having two different versions anyways instead of having one with an IAP?

      • NightOwl@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        11 months ago

        I like the feeling of a clean app that doesn’t have any ad integration at all.

      • limerod@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        The in-app purchases can be buggy with amnesia hitting them once a while, making you install/reinstall just so google remembers you purchased pro. This happens when you have more than 1 google accounts on android.

      • N1NJ4W4RR10R_@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Another reason may have been due to the in app purchase stuffing up sometimes. I believe it was a Google thing, but iirc sometimes it would just forget you’d bought pro within the app and start showing ads again.

    • Nate@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I remember gravity box had a Paypal donation link and pro would be unlocked with your payment code. Not sure if Google Play allows this as it bypasses their 30%

        • Otter@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          How does it work for apps that are a part of other services?

          Say a company has an app available to all customers that pay for some unrelated service, it would be weird to require them to do the transaction over Google Play?

  • UnknownQuantity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    Apart from removing ads I don’t really need anything from ultra. I’d be happy to pay one off fee, but I won’t be doing subscription.

    • Powerpoint@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      This. I want to just pay a one off fee and remove the ads and donate as necessary.