It’s something I struggle with. Some bad news comes out about some public persona doing something shitty and they get cancelled. But sometimes I really struggle with giving up the things they’ve made because I like them. There are also occasions where the person has been accused of something and it doesn’t seem true to me, or I think they’re genuinely sorry and have been punished enough, and the context isn’t being considered.

What do you think? Who do you feel conflicted about enjoying?

  • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Kevin Spacey. He’s just such a good actor, I like every movie he’s in. The first season of House of Cards was amazing too.

  • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    Both of the Linuses

    Sebastian and Torvalds

    Sebastian because most of the shit he’s been accused of has either been fixed openly, or was proven mostly false.

    Torvalds because while he can be extremely rude, he generally only does it when the person deserves to be called out. It’s not like he’s going off at random people. Society says he should use more tact, but the dude is literally responsible for creating and now maintaining arguably the most important piece of the server software stack globally. There’s also a very high chance he’s on the spectrum.

    • Deestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yeah people can complain Torvalds was rude all day, but fuck me if the people he yelled at couldn’t be aggressively disrespectful in bringing half-assed work to the table and doing damage or at best wasting other’s people time.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        He’s the literal “You’re not wrong, you’re just an asshole”. But if he wasn’t that way, I wonder if we’d have what we have. A nicer developer wouldn’t get the same attention.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          You probably needed someone like him in a technical leadership role somewhere, the problem was that he became the face as well.

          • bizarroland@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            9 days ago

            And when he acts shitty towards somebody, he does it publicly, where he himself can also receive the backlash from what he is doing.

            He’s not attempting to build a reputation as being a nice guy or a thought leader or anything. He is getting shit done, and anyone that’s got a problem with it or him can either go do it better than him or stfu

        • ByteOnBikes@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 days ago

          I argue about this all the time, especially if you have to work with non-coders. People who don’t code do not understand the big picture.

          Steve Wozniak is brilliant, and had Steve Jobs explain the vision and sell it to non coders.

          For Microsoft. That was Ballmer.

          If youre a tech lead who lets a group of marketing folks try to define the course of any application, you need someone really strong at communication to fight for you. Unfortunately, Linus didnt have one and ripping people a new asshole was the next best thing.

    • SatyrSack@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Sebastian because most of the shit he’s been accused of has either been fixed openly, or was proven mostly false.

      From what I understand, nothing was proven false, but there were things that were not proven true, as in “we couldn’t find documented evidence that this employee was sexually harassed”, which obviously doesn’t necessarily mean that it did not happen. They just couldn’t find a paper trail of it happening, which is understandable.

      On the other hand, things like all the factual inaccuracies and whatnot were absolutely undeniable.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        I think there have been attempts to cancel Torvalds after he’s slapped down some idiot in a particularly harsh manner, but I don’t think they ever stick because he doesn’t go off on people unless they really try to do shit that would compromise the integrity of the kernel and didn’t take the message to fix/bail on something when it was previously provided.

        • 5too@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          As I recall, he also apologized for the slap down, which seems like it often helps with getting cancelled

    • ashughes@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      How do you define “cancelled”?

      As far as I can tell both Sebastian and Torvalds are just as successful (if not more) in their respective roles today as they were before any “controversies” surrounding them were made public.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 days ago

    I mean, I didn’t throw out my Harry Potter boxed set just becsuse Rowling is a dumb fucking TERF. I just don’t continue buying shit she profits off of, and can see tons of questionable things in her work that I didn’t question before knowing her thoughts on things.

        • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 days ago

          there is an argument to be made for preventing further money being made by giving it to someone who will otherwise buy it new, but then you also have to consider additionally exposure if you give it to someone who wouldn’t otherwise have bought it…

      • yyyesss?@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        i don’t blame you for your choice. she’s alive and using money from the franchise to actively fund initiatives that hurt people. but let me copy my comment from elsewhere in this thread (about Scott Adams and old Dilbert books)

        hey, read the books you already own all you want. that doesn’t put anymore money in his pocket.

        being “cancelled” doesn’t mean we stick our fingers in our ears and act like it didn’t happen. it just means being conscientious about funding the lives of people who are actively making the world a worse place.

        this is a critical detail that I think people often miss

      • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        I feel conflicted about reading and writing Harry Potter fan fiction. The negative side is it draws attention to the franchise. The positive side is it helps people enjoy Harry Potter content without benefiting Rowling.

    • pyrinix@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      9 days ago

      The Harry Potter universe is bigger than her to where we can love the universe for what it is and can cut her out easily.

    • Jmsnwbrd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      9 days ago

      I understand people’s feelings towards her, but to call her transphobic seems a bit harsh. She doesn’t show hatred for trans people, but a need to show that they are different than woman born as female. Although this might be ignorant in some ways. . . I don’t see it as a form of hatred or fear towards trans people. We as a society have a hard time looking at nuance.

      • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        8 days ago

        Just because she doesn’t outright say I hate trans. People doesn’t mean that she uses her fame her money and her businesses to help incorporate and promote anti-trans policies in the UK and also promote those ideas in the world ideas that trans people aren’t people. How is that not the definition of hatred just in a different way you need to stop being so ignorant because you really are and I’m only saying that to help you open up to reality.

  • Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    9 days ago

    I like the world building in Fifth Element and Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets. But Luc Besson is probably a rapist and certainly a sexual assaulter. I’ll watch his old stuff I already own but won’t put any more money towards it nor support any new projects.

    Edit: oh, also he’s not “cancelled”. He came out with another movie this year or last, if I recall. 9 times our of 10, celebrities that say they were “cancelled” just had their feefees hurt by people on social media.

    • lemmylommy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      9 days ago

      Also a pedo. From his wiki page:

      Besson’s second wife was actress and director Maïwenn Le Besco, whom he started dating when he was 32 and she was 15 after having met three years earlier.[46] They married in late 1992 when Le Besco, 16, was pregnant with their daughter Shanna, who was born on 3 January 1993.[47][deprecated source] Le Besco later claimed that their relationship inspired Besson’s film Léon (1994), where the plot involved the emotional relationship between an adult man and a 12-year-old girl (played by then 12-year-old Natalie Portman).

    • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      His video about what happened is very surreal. It’s on YouTube. I think it’s tied to his House of Cards character but has dual meaning?

      Indeed a great actor, but as a Trekker human being, fuck him for how he treated Anthony Rapp (the engineer from Star Trek Discovery).

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        by RAPPS account, he was almost raped by spacey. and the other commenter was trying to defend him, hes not the one you should be going after.

    • MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Totally.

      …and if you’re going to take down Kevin Spacey, he should be the 1000th male actor or rock star you go after.

      Like…yeah…people should decide if all the accusations (and no convictions) are worth anything…I think they are. But…why are people like Johnny Depp, Mel Gibson, Alex Baldwin, Sean Penn, etc still working…maybe even working more after crazy shit they did?

      • spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        9 days ago

        Did Depp get accused of more than the Heard thing? He went through a trial and was cleared, I personally don’t think he deserves to be dragged, but that’s just me I know others disagree

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        depp got way screwed over by HEARD, to the point of being blacklisted by hollywood, him suing heard was justified.

        Kevin spacey had legitimate SA/SH accusations against him, most of it dint stick because at least 1 accuser died before he could do it.

        mel gibson got cancelled by his antisemitic thing, but he mostly in christian films anyways. I think alec baldwins problem was him being careless with firearms.

        • MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          He didn’t. I get it…you fell for his bullshit on TV.

          You should really brush on on people beyond the one news story you remember off the top of your head.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      but hes been doubling down every since to deflect attention away, which pretty yucky. RAPP said hes over it? is he really, or he doesnt want to ruffle feathers in hollywood, which has more executives that are perverts.

  • Bristlecone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Neil Gaiman. I’m extremely depressed that he’s actually a POS, and because I loved his work so much, I’m conflicted. His work itself seemed to have well interrogated values woven into it’s fiber, but I guess you never can tell.

    Edit: really fucking bummed about Red Hot Chili Peppers too

      • Bristlecone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 days ago

        Helllll yeah! Terry Pratchett, but also I’m keeping ALL celebrity at arms length without heavy vetting at this point

    • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 days ago

      Same with his ex? Wife Amanda Palmer. I love the Dresden Dolls and she’s been very inspirational but knowing she was in on it was fucked up.

    • UsefulIdiot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 days ago

      This broke my damn heart. His work seemed to have the values I hold dear and be so insightful and then… he’s getting in the bath with girls who depend on him for housing.

      I am thinking that power corrupts. I came up with that but you can use that phrase if you want.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 days ago

      Pretty sure the Anthony Keides stuff was well known for decades. It’s in his autobiography that was published like 20 years ago or something.

      He’s always been the worst part of that band

      • Bristlecone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        It has been! That’s why it’s even more fucking disgusting to me. It isn’t well known or talked about, fucking bastards just get a fucking pass sometimes and I hate it

    • pyrinix@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I remember the moment news broke out, that I just got rid of all books he authored. The Sandman graphic novels, Coraline, American Gods, Stardust .etc

      All I was looking forward to reading someday but nope.

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      I have a theory that all writers are somewhat hypocritical. As an amateur writer myself (I write fan fiction and am also working on original work I hope to get published eventually), I find sometimes the moral messages I try to weave into my work are sometimes messages that I myself am struggling to live up to and writing is a way of trying to work through that

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    michael jackson made incredible music. i don’t even know how much of the stuff about him is true but it does feel weird listening to his stuff now, even though it’s extremely well made.

    • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      I don’t think we’ll ever know. I have a feeling he actually wasn’t a pedophile at all, but just felt close to children because he had Peter Pan syndrome or something. He seemed very infantile to me is the only real sense I got of him. Strange person. But without question he did make some r really iconic music.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        yeah that’s my impression as well. being a child star really fucks you up mentally.

        then again i haven’t seen the documentaries.

        • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          I agree, and the thing is we can never really know what someone is like all the time even if we get to know some aspects of them well.

          I’ve been shocked by things that some people I knew did, that I would never have thought they were capable of.

          I hope that is not the case for MJ, but it might be. And we’ll likely never know.

      • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 days ago

        Ehhhh, I’ve seen some pics of him being happily surrounded with people known for being sex pests/pedos so idk. Two things can be true, you know, he might have been mentally and developmentally different but he might have also touched some kids, sadly.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          9 days ago

          happily surrounded with people known for being sex pests/pedos so idk

          He worked in the recording industry and Hollywood. It’s pretty hard to avoid in those businesses.

        • bizarroland@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          I’ve heard rumors that he was either physically or chemically castrated to keep his beautiful, pure singing voice.

          If that is the case, then it would kind of explain how fucked up he is, or how fucked up he was.

          • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 days ago

            Oof. Didn’t he have kids though? Or is there a form of castration that doesn’t affect one’s ability to reproduce? Regardless, yeah, it doesn’t absolve him of his sins but let’s just say they’re attenuating factors for his judgement.

    • turdburglar@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 days ago

      mj was something special if very fuken weird, but the maker of his best jams was quincy jones. if you don’t know him, spend some time investigating his catalog.

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 days ago

      He was an incredibly talented artist. I think his father deserves most of the blame for Michael’s bizarre behavior. Most adults would struggle with the pressures of fame and performing that he spent his whole life under from the time he was like 10 years old. Joe recognized that his kids were talented and then proceeded to squeeze every last red cent he could out of them. No wonder Michael snapped.

    • pyrinix@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      The fact that he had to pay a family hush-money was incredibly suspicious enough.

      I don’t give a shit about Michael Jackson. Except maybe his upbringing with his piece of shit father has had something to do with how he’d later behave. Glad Joe is dead.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 days ago

        If you’re a slightly creepy odd duck with large amounts of money, it’d make sense to pay a settlement rather than letting a case go to trial even if you’re innocent, because juries can be wayward, especially in civil cases, and the reputational damage can easily cost you more than the settlement. So I don’t buy the no smoke without fire theory, especially with the proven cases of shakedown artists abetted by contingency-fee slimebag lawyers.

        I lean towards the view that MJ was a wrong 'un, but also wouldn’t be surprised if it came out that he was just a twisted, damaged, traumatized, socially isolated guy.

  • duncan_bayne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    9 days ago

    Scott Adams, creator of Dilbert. I have several of his print books and still enjoy reading them; ditto his old cartoons. They really spoke to me years ago, as a cubicle-coder.

    • yyyesss?@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 days ago

      hey, read the books you already own all you want. that doesn’t put anymore money in his pocket.

      being “cancelled” doesn’t mean we stick our fingers in our ears and act like it didn’t happen. it just means being conscientious about funding the lives of people who are actively making the world a worse place.

      this is a critical detail that I think people often miss

    • cyberwitch@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      I think it’s wild that he’s the same man who made Dilbert trans and feminist in his tv show finale and it actually got kind of sincere.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      I stopped liking dilbert when it became obvious that dilbert was becoming a side character so he could prop up PHB. Anything I’ve seen since then is just insufferable.

    • Almacca@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      ‘The Dilbert Principle’ is a great book. It’s a shame he threw all that goodwill away.

  • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I don’t enjoy or like public figures. Having never met them, I cannot like them. I do enjoy the works or products of some people, and knowing the person(s) who created something can influence my chances of consuming it.

    There are some people who have done, or accused of doing bad things, but they have created works that I enjoyed.

    AKA, I never “liked” Neil Gaiman. But I do like American Gods.

    • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      Fair. I wish the art people made wasn’t tainted by their behaviour.

      Like I have a soft spot for Vince Neil even though he killed people drunk driving, because of how his poor little daughter died and how badly it’s affected him. I can’t help it.

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I can get onboard with separate the art from the artist, mostly. Especially if you’re not paying for the content, arrgh.

      I find it hard to look at them without thinking of what they did, though. It’s hard for me to see past the artist to the art, when the artist is so shitty. I mean, he’s right there in my face, and I know what he did, so that’s all I’m thinking about when they’re acting.

      Public people should do everything they can to keep their private lives private. Some of them are very good at it, so it is possible.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      and sandman too. unfortunately with neftflix being too stingy and gaiman have all the SA/SH accusations agains tthem, we wont have anymore series or shows out of his work.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 days ago

      I kind of think that Lovecraft was doing about the least-worst thing he could with his absolutely massive trove of neuroses and phobias, which definitely included racism and xenophobia.

      He was convinced that the universe was chaotic and horrifying and that the only thing we could hold on to for stability was racial purity, and that’s pretty fucked up, but he turned those feelings into spooky stories about interdimensional space monsters, which is certainly a lot better than writing political tracts or trying to convince everyone that the Armenians are actually to blame for all of our problems.

      Therapy would have been even better, but writing spooky stories was better than some of the very real alternatives that other people were exploring in the 19-teens and twenties.

    • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 days ago

      Lovecraft was my first experience with seperating the artist and the work. Since then, I’ve had to deal with it frequently but eventually you get used to it.

      • Mister Neon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        9 days ago

        Turns out that the author that popularized the horror of the alien and unknown was a racist and xenophobic putz. Who would have guessed?

    • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      I wouldn’t feel too bad about this. He’s going where he needs to for funding/support. The War on Science is his latest book, and it’s like a who’s who of shitty people complaining about how their academic efforts are being attacked for whatever reason and the real answer is generally assault, harassment, or embarrassing their employers (universities). One great example was a professor being outraged on the infringement of their free speech when the university asked people to not use blackface as part of their Halloween costumes. Note what I said there. They didn’t say they couldn’t wear blackface, just that they should reconsider doing so. That is the exact opposite of censorship. I went into that 4-hour (!) video thinking I’d watch an example or two and couldn’t stop.

      If anything, the people you want to reach might find Krauss approachable. Use him as a tool for good. And if you find someone more palatable, use them for the climate deniers who aren’t on the anti-woke train.

  • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 days ago

    I really liked Chappelle show, but he’s really gone bad the last few years being anti trans and all. To say he’s canceled is a bit much, though. He’s still rich and popular, and selling tickets.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Well hes certainly not canceled. He just had a new Netflix special. Been getting them consistently the entire time.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s shocking to me how willing people are to hang out with Chappelle and even ride his dick, but I guess the Saudi thing showed that a lot of those folks who embed progressive values in their material are just playing characters.

    • Tedesche@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      9 days ago

      I don’t think he’s actually anti-trans, he just likes making jokes about them and refused to be cowed by people telling him to stop. Just my sense of it though.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        So he’s just a shithead asshole instead of a bigot? Pretty lateral move, honestly, if he doesn’t even believe in the bigotry he spreads.

        He quit his show because bigots were using his material to laugh AT black people instead of WITH them. But he’s more than happy to change the butt if the joke so he can still feel good about the jokes he makes instead of having to be self reflective.

      • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I agree with you. I don’t think he’s anti-trans. I think he’s incredibly insensitive.

        What I truly believe here is that his perspective is that it’s progressive to make jokes about groups that are historically off limits because doing so breaks a social barrier. That’s what I think he believes and I think he’s getting it wrong.

        • Tedesche@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          I don’t think social mores factor into it all for him. When he said he finds the position of trans people genuinely funny, I think he was being honest. I do think he went too far with his jokes about them, simply in terms of sheer number; it was a social faux pas that strained the credulity of his stated position, but I personally believe him when he says he just finds the whole situation very funny.

          I think he doesn’t care what other people think of his comedy at this point, and I don’t really have an opinion on that. I suppose I sort of respect it, but I also think he’s definitely passed into the realm of bad taste at this point. I don’t think he means anything bad by it though. Maybe he is insensitive, but comedians aren’t known for their sensitivity. I understand the criticism against him for it and think it’s valid.

          I’m not defending the offensiveness of his jokes, just stating that I think they’re just jokes to him, and he doesn’t actually mean them in a mean-spirited light. If I were to talk to him about it, I would probably ask him how he feels about White comedians that make jokes about Black people, who also claim they’re not advocating anti-Black views, and just find the humor in their situations. I imagine he might reveal himself to be quite the hypocrite under that line of questioning. Most of us are hypocrites.

      • bizarroland@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        9 days ago

        I honestly think that he is a subversive ally.

        Like, the things that he says, the way that he says them pisses off trans people and gets the anti-trans people on his side.

        But then he also preaches a philosophy of live and let live, do whatever the fuck you want to do, just leave me alone and let me live my life, which also goes to his enemies.

        So there are probably people who have transphobia, who like Dave Chappelle, who leave trans people alone, or quickly identify themselves to trans people by making a Dave Chappelle joke or reference, and therefore, incidentally, protect trans people from interacting with people that might otherwise do bad things to them.

        I could be wrong. He might just be an asshole. He probably is an asshole either way. I’m not a stan for him, but that’s the vibe that I get from his whole act.

        • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          The problem with that is that the libertarians that attracts are hypocrites. They don’t let live, just like Chapelle himself isn’t letting live.

          It’s easy to say “live and let live” when you’re in a relative position of unassailable authority.
          It’s easy for someone with the means to do whatever they want to say “everyone should be able to do what they want”.\

          I should be allowed to mock you, but you shouldn’t be allowed to do anything about it

          • bizarroland@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            9 days ago

            Are you suggesting violence as an appropriate response to his commentary?

            Have you encountered anyone who has been emboldened to commit either emotional or physical crimes against another person because of something Dave Chappelle has said or done?

            If so, then I’m more than willing to change the way I view his schtick, but I cannot find any correlation between an increase in any sort of hurt or violence towards trans people, and anything Dave Chappelle has said or done.

            I think he’s serving as a pressure release valve for the people who have never encountered a trans person (who was not masking their transness) or who have suddenly been thrust into the realization that the world contains trans people and don’t know how to cope with it.

            Therefore I feel like the things that he says have an overall net positive effect on the way trans people are treated, even though he himself looks and sounds like a piece of shit saying it and that he offends trans people when he says it.

            • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              9 days ago

              Are you suggesting violence as an appropriate response to his commentary?

              What the fuck?

              Have you encountered anyone who has been emboldened to commit either emotional or physical crimes against another person because of something Dave Chappelle has said or done?

              That is crazy disingenuous. If you’re this passionate about the subject then you know full well it’s not the work of a single person, it’s normalized a little at a time, bit by bit, until people do feel emboldened to take action. Chappelle is part of the problem, and as a very public figure then it’s even less ok to let it slide, because people take cues about what is ok and what isn’t from public figures.

              And if you’re going to say that trans people aren’t already the subject of discrimination, than we cannot have a civilized discussion.

              • bizarroland@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                9 days ago

                “I should be allowed to mock you, but you shouldn’t be allowed to do anything about it” < your words

                Isn’t not giving Dave Chappelle money or time or attention the grand sum of things that you can do about his stance without violence?

                I think you and I have had interactions elsewhere on Lemmy, and typically they’re very antagonistic and I don’t know why that is.

                I earnestly try to be a reasonable person and to express my views without judgment of other people.

                I do this in hopes that debate produces something positive, but from what I remember, typically, no matter what I say to you, your response is to exacerbate the argument rather than resolve it.

                Sometimes other people have views that do not mesh with yours, yet they are not your enemy.

                I know trans people. I have trans friends. I live in a very progressive area by choice. I have gone to protests to protect women and trans people alike.

                I am an ally, and if you think that me believing or having a reason to believe that Dave Chappelle is also an ally makes me not an ally, then that’s pretty much the end of the conversation, right?

                • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  “do anything about it” doesn’t have to mean violence. What the fuck? Why is that the first thing you jump to?

                  Isn’t not giving Dave Chappelle money or time or attention the grand sum of things that you can do about his stance without violence?

                  Yes, that is the do anything about it that I’m talking about. The thing Chapelle calls cancel culture, and fights against. So if violence isn’t allowed and neither is organizing to have a voice as loud as his, then what is allowed besides letting him have his way?

                  makes me not an ally

                  I don’t choose who is or isn’t an ally.
                  If the consensus of the trans community is supporting Chapelle, then I’ll shut up about it because I’d clearly be mistaken, but that doesn’t seem to be the case afaict, which aligns with my understanding of why Chapelle is problematic in general; he uses libertarianism as a carte blanche to pick on minorities. this just demonstrates how libertarianism is ironically discriminatory in practice, but it teaches bigots a language to defend themselves with.

                  I earnestly try to be a reasonable person and to express my views without judgment of other people. […] typically, no matter what I say to you, your response is to exacerbate the argument rather than resolve it.

                  How am I supposed to interpret this, from someone who immediately accused me of supporting violence and then doubled down on that accusation?

    • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      9 days ago

      I doubt he’d go around punching/harassing transpeople (but correct me if I’m wrong, of course, I’m not dying on the Dave Chapelle hill, lol), he might just disagree with some of the current Western culture around it and understanding of it.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        “It’s not like he goes around assaulting trans people, he just disagrees with the current culture of letting trans people be who they are instead of masking and hiding themselves”

        • dditty@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yeah while I think Chapelle is entitled to free speech as a comedian and all that, his doubling- and tripling-down with the trans jokes are not only unfunny, they are embraced by bigots and embolden their subsequent hateful rhetoric and actions. If Chapelle actually cared one iota about trans people, he would just tell jokes about literally anything else. It’s not like there’s a shortage of topics to poke fun at.

          He’s a petulant, obstinate, man baby and deserving of all the backlash he has received. I honestly think he must be washed up and creatively tapped since he won’t let the trans jokes go.

    • ByteOnBikes@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      This one hurts because he really pushed an art form.

      Cartoons were not at all well respected as a method of storytelling back in the day. And Walt threw himself into the fire pretty often to strike success and build the Disney empire.

    • ByteOnBikes@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Privileged white folk really don’t realize how much good Bill Cosby has done for poor kids. He contributed an insane amount to the community. He supported schools programs financially and helped a whole generation of black folk.

      And when the news came out, you better believe we were all in the 5 stages of grief.

      Just a complete 180 on his entire body of work. Like finding out Batman used homeless people for target practice. Or Jesus was a sith lord.

    • pyrinix@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      9 days ago

      The only respect I’m ever going to give Bill Cosby, is how he stood up and criticized the black community for their ghetto-like behavior and how they continued blaming the white man for all of their problems. That took balls and only he could have done it because he’s black as well.

      • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        9 days ago

        So uh I’m guessing that aligns with your beliefs. Please explain to me how white people didn’t fuck over black people? Obviously not all problems black people face are from white people, and obviously not ever single white person has fucked over a black person, but please explain how white people aren’t responsible for a lot of the problems black people go through right now please?

        I’ve got a few pretty big counter examples of how they did right here that I’m sure you’d find interesting.

        • pyrinix@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Excuse you? What I said did not speak of anything of what my beliefs are. You are just assuming in a baseless manner. That is in of itself, a huge problem with society today so thanks for being a demonstration of that problem.

          Obviously not all problems black people face are from white people

          So you went on this entire tirade of rambling and you say that snippet. How about you project some sources that example that little detail, instead of virtue-signaling the way that you have?

          I bet you won’t. You’ll just take all of the virtuous self-patting upvotes of your little rant like you have, and provide me nothing in return, just petty downvotes. That’s exactly how I expect you to behave.

          • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            How come every time someone points out obviously racist coded stuff, the response is “well I didn’t directly say what my opinion was so how dare you, you’ll never know” like we don’t have reading comprehension and dog whistles.

            Then you hone in on the one thing that might validate your blatantly obvious opinion, and tell me to give you sources, instead of actually answering my question.

            Then you throw a tantrum saying I won’t give you what you want, and that if I don’t give you what you want, you’re right.

            Even though you didn’t have the balls to answer my question.

            Here’s a surprise for you, three examples of Problems Black People Can Have That Have Nothing To Do With White People, all of which I can personally attest to:

            Black person cheated on their black spouse and they got divorced.

            Black person’s car got a flat.

            Black person’s favorite cereal was out at the grocery store.

            Those problems don’t have anything to do with white people. But some related problems in those situations do.

            The judge ordered way harsher child support of the black husband than a white husband would’ve had to deal with.

            Cops harassed and threatened to arrest the black person trying to change a tire instead of offering help.

            The person at the register accused the black person of stealing for no reason.

            So yeah. Three examples. Bet you don’t have the balls to answer my question though.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 days ago

        He was a holier than thou hypocrite. Dude had been drugging and raping women for years before he got on his high horse about that.

        Fuck him.

    • daggermoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 days ago

      I have a weird interest in South African rock music. I would buy SA CD compilations on ebay and discogs Nd listen to all the cool SA bands. One of them had a track by an artist called Max Normal. The track fucking slapped. No one in the US has heard of these SA artists I listen to. One day I mention my interest to a coworker and he said something like “oh man, you should check out Die Antwood.” So, I did. I’m reading about Die Antwood and I had a holy fuck moment. They were the same artist on that compilation CD. They changed their name to Die Antwood. The artist of an obscure track on a compilation CD I have went on to become an internationally known artist. I also found out they are pretty shitty people. Life is crazy sometimes.