• crowsby@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    They’re paying Joe Rogan $200M to be the exclusive home of his conspiracy disinformation bullshit, and they’re more concerned about forest_stream_with_gentle_rain_3.mp3?

    • Blimp7990@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Joe Rogan

      Joe rogan’s penis is NORMAL SIZED and don’t you DARE say otherwise you cuck

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I don’t understand how people listening to podcasts could possibly cost a podcast platform money. It feels an awful lot like if people consume your product actively and you lose money then maybe you just shouldn’t be a business.

      • toasterboi0100@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        11 months ago

        I assume they mean something like “we have to pay white noise podcast creators when the money could have instead ended up in our coffers or paid to record labels”

      • Kyoyeou (Ki jəʊ juː)@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        i’m guessing Creator money as the 10$ you pay is split depending of the time you listened too each artist. And also as they are podcasts and have constant sound changes, the file could be heavier than usual, which costs more bandwidth to send, or at least more place to store

      • Philolurker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        From reading the article, it sounds like Spotify itself doesn’t get directly affected. Instead, the record companies and advertisers are upset. The record companies, because the shared pool of royalties that gets paid out is now getting split with white noise creators, leaving them a smaller share of the pie. The advertisers, because most people listening to white noise are using it to fall asleep or just keeping it on in the background, and therefore nobody will be listening/paying attention when the ads come on.

        Tough titties for them, you may say, but if they don’t like it, they may take their respective balls and go home. That would seriously impact Spotify, since without the music, most users will quickly lose interest, and the advertisers are a large part of their revenue stream. If they don’t do something, they could end being a streaming service predominantly for white noise, which would be far less profitable.

        It should also be taken into account that a lot of the white noise hits were not organic, but the result of a problem with how Spotify set up their algorithm.

        • AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Ah thanks for taking the time to explain. This makes sense.

          I think this article is a little disingenuous. the record companies aren’t losing money, they’re losing market share. Many users simply weren’t listening to their music. Whether they were listening to the white noise is irrelevant. They WEREN’T listening to Taylor Swift, even accidentally.

          I’m guessing this will cause Spotify to put time limits on playback (if they haven’t already)

  • gerryflap@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t really see the problem. People like to listen to the stuff and Spotify provides it and pays the creator. Seems like everything is working as intended. Looks like it’s just greedy people getting annoyed that they can’t get even richer.

      • gerryflap@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah that is true from a monetary perspective. But even then, if people would rather listen to white noise then I guess that’s just how it is. Greedy people will be greedy tho.

        • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          I can understand, though, that someone who actually puts effort into producing music is kind of pissed if someone who simply uploads noise gets as much money per stream.

          • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            If someone is genuinely mad that people would rather listen to white noise than their music then they should start working on making something better than white noise

              • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                Exactly the point, any artist with actual talent wouldn’t and shouldn’t be concerned about someone making white noise. If they did, they are just pumping trash to make money and are not that different from what they hate.

                • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  You don’t seem to understand how Spotify works. There’s a fixed cake size that then gets shared between artists. If someone is just using Spotify as an overnight noise generator, the generator artist essentially siphons money away from actual artists.

                  It’s perfectly understandable that artists don’t like that. Especially given the already very low Spotify payouts.

                  I really don’t get this weirdly hostile stance here. Is gaming a system now somehow a noble act in itself? The same people who grin at the stoopid artist peoples here will become furious when Amazon uses perfectly legal tax evasion tactics. But that’s of course something completely different, because suddenly you are a victim.

  • Copernican@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think from an advertising revenue pov, it makes sense for Spotify to treat this as a problem. Spotify has an incentive to attract advertisers to spend money on ad space in their ad supported audio content. Part of the value is having ads placed in spaces with a high probability o"viewability" which is basically saying that when the ad was delivered, did it deliver in an environment where someone saw it or heard it. Regular podcasts probably have a high viewability because listeners are more actively engaged. White noise “pod casts” probably have a low viewability because the whole point is for it to put users to sleep and be background noise. So I think there’s probably a challenge for Spotify to increase the value to advertisers by demonstrating white noise machines aren’t eating up their ad dollars. And there’s a challenge with the content producers of non white noise to be compensated fairly for having higher viewership generating content than white noise.

  • JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Damn here I thought something that makes sense, like me using cracked APKs, was affecting their profits. Good good.

  • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    I feel like someone listening to white noise wouldn’t simply replace it with Ed Sheeran if the white noise was not available.

    • raptir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s not the issue though. There’s a finite amount of money that Spotify pays out based on the amount of subscription fees it is bringing in. That $38 million would be divided up amongst all the other artists if it wasn’t being paid to white noise podcasts.

      • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That $38 million would be divided up amongst all the other artists if it wasn’t being paid to white noise podcasts.

        It would be divided amongst the record labels and distributed to artists as those labels see fit.

        • sounddrill@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          So it’s not the user getting screwed, not the artists getting screwed, but record labels ?!

          Record labels are getting screwed over by indie artists in a new niche that has exploded

          This is 100% a massive W

          • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yes, those famously equitable contracts with artists, we’ve all heard legends of their great generosity.

          • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I mean, yes…unfortunately those contracts have always been very exploitative for all but the top music acts.

            • Blimp7990@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              famously top artist taylor swift had a very great situation with her contract, she just decided to re-record her entire discography for funsies. like when you re-read a book.

      • synae[he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve listened to some music that is only a few steps away from white noise- atmospheric black metal, dark ambient, etc. Stuff that many people would scoff at and not even call it music. But it was intentionally created, and put out there for people to listen to. Regardless of the quality or enjoyability of the music, it’s unreasonable to draw a line as to what is or is not “sound meant for other people to listen to”.

        Just because someone has found a way to make “music” with less effort and doesn’t make it “not music”, regardless of what it sounds like. Hell, one of the most famous pieces of experimental/avant garde music “4’33” is literally silence from the performers and the “music” is the sounds of the environment you are experiencing it in.

        If I want to listen to any of these things on Spotify, well, they better pay whoever the rights-holder is that licensed it to Spotify to stream at the agreed upon rate. Spotify, other artists, and (most importantly) their labels can whine all they want. These are the contracts they’ve agreed to and as a subscriber I’ll exercise my contractually-agreed-upon ability to listen to whatever is on the platform for as long as I want. Maybe I’m awake, maybe I’m not, maybe I’m subliminally absorbing the music while sleeping. That’s no one’s business but my own.

      • FringeTheory999@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        So someone creates an ambient noise track, people enjoy the ambient track, and the person who created the ambient track gets paid. I don’t see the problem.

        • rglullis@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          White noise it’s not copyrightable. So, anyone can make a copy, including Spotify themselves. They could “pirate” all the white noise podcasts and redirect them to something they own. Problem solved.

            • rglullis@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              If you are a Spotify exec, there is a problem.

              If you are an indie musician who sees your payout being reduced because Spotify says they need to pay white noise podcasts, there is a problem.

              If you believe that this is a zero-sum game and Spotify prints money like magic, there is no problem.

              • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                All you’re saying is that different tracks/shows are competing for attention, and white noise is doing well in that competition. You could make the same argument about any genre.

                Country music is taking a portion of the income that white noise could get paid. Therefore remove all country music from sp0tify.

  • Nijuu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Couple of things. What are White Noise Podcasts?. Spotify only started to offer Podcasts (got annoyed them pushing them in the recent UIs) a while back didnt they?. Imagine many people who use podcasts for any length of time actually use another service or app (in my case Podcast addict and now Antennapod). I used to use Spotify premium for music only. Thanks for all the recommendations further down for alternatives but how many offer mainstream music/download purchase etc?

    • clausetrophobic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago
      1. White noise podcasts are usually an hour or more of literal white noise.

      2. Many people have been using Spotify for podcasts since they were introduced to the platform in 2015. The app has features specific to podcasts, and why wouldn’t you want all your audio entertainment in one place?

      • apochryphal_triptych@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        why wouldn’t you want all your audio entertainment in one place?

        Because Spotify is known to track and sell your listening habits. It’s fine (for me) that they track that I listen to AC/DC right before Ghostly Kisses. Music is music. A person’s podcasts can get a lot more personal. Politically, emotionally, and religiously personal. I don’t like to be profiled.

      • marmo7ade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        why wouldn’t you want all your audio entertainment in one place?

        Your desire to have a product function in a specific way does not magically reprogram the product to meet your expectation. This is a classic IT end-user issue.

        • Here is program X, which does Y

        • I want the program to do Z and will attempt to use it for that purpose despite the developer warning not to do that thing

        Spotify podcasts are not sleep aides. They’re going to enforce it if you don’t get the hint.

  • Rhabuko@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Spotify bleeds money just like all the other streaming services and is kept alive by dumb investors that think, it will be someday profitable. Maybe they should stop trying to push so hard for podcasts and focus on their core business.

      • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It’s kind of funny how the modern narrative around music streaming never mentions record labels, who in all honesty are the ones who always have been screwing over artists.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    …But, why?

    I can download a white noise app for free, and never have to worry about any advertising at all. Why would I insist on listening to one that’s going to have irregular breaks to tell me that I should use Nord VPN, play Raid: Shadow Legends, or get therapy through Better Help? (Caveat: I actually use Nord VPN, and have for about six years, but I’m probably switching to Mulvad or Proton in a month.)

    • jemorgan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The wording is a little misleading. A “white noise” podcast isn’t just 80 hours of TV static, it might be a recording of a cafe, a bus station, nature, a storm, etc. not something that’s just generated on-device, meaning it’s gotta be streamed.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    How is white noise costing this much money? Surely the bandwidth isn’t that expensive

    And why does Spotify care if they’re paying out white noise creators from the same fun they pay music creators? It’s still time in service right?

    • Stizzah@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I see you don’t speak capitalism. Allow me to translate: Spotify is not making (enough?) ads money on independent noise creators. Big record labels are not making any money on independent noise creators. These leeches are outraged that they cannot profit onto those paesants’ work, but they say it like they were losing money (that is not true) because they don’t want to sound like leeches.

      • hh93@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        How is white noise even something that someone can have a license on?

        Shouldn’t it be identical no matter where you listen to it and therefore impossible to get money from?

        • criitz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s not actually all white noise. It’s stuff like waves crashing, raindrops, etc.

  • Batmancer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    From the article: “Once Spotify realized how much attention was going to white noise podcasts, the company considered removing these shows from the talk feed and prohibiting future uploads while redirecting the audience towards comparable programming that was more economical for Spotify — doing so, according to the document, would boost Spotify’s annual gross profit by €35 million, or $38 million.” That doesn’t sound like it’s costing them $38 million, it sounds like they are speculating they COULD make $38 million. I was confused as to how they would be losing money.

    • English Mobster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      So the problem is that white noise doesn’t compress very easily.

      Compression algorithms are generally designed to reduce noise; if you have something that’s extremely noisy it’s really hard to compress because that’s not what the algorithms were designed to do.

      This means that these podcasts take up more space, which means they use more bandwidth than an equivalent non-white-noise solution.

      A middle ground would be banning these “podcasts” and then having a white noise generator built into the app. The white noise generator would run locally on your device (very easy to make white noise) and wouldn’t cost any bandwidth at all.

      • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s not just actual “white noise.” It’s many kinds of background noise like nature sounds, etc. Has to be recorded and often edited.

        It’s a legit product that makes sp0tify more valuable. They should embrace it but they’re fucking morons who hate both their artists and their audience.

        Fuck sp0tify a million times. I really hate them.

        • ilikekeyboards@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          What do you recommend to me so I can easily download and discover music that’s not spotify. You hate them but it seems they’re the top of the game right now

          • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Bandcamp has recommendations

            Allmusic.com has “similar artists” and browse-by-genre and -style (and mood and theme etc)

            Everything you listen to on YouTube sends you down a new rabbithole

            Discogs.com has recommendations

            Allmusic is 100% my favorite place to find new recommendations. I get to actively hunt instead of being fed by an algorithm (though they have too many ads now).

            If you absolutely must be a $p0tify zombie who is mentally unable to find recommendations literally everywhere else in our music-obsessed world then you can still buy the albums you like to actually support the artists instead of basically pirating through a big tech app.

        • mindrover@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Another solution then: automatically download/cache a user’s most frequently played tracks. I know downloading is a premium feature or whatever but they should consider it if it would save them money.

          • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Not just frequently played tracks. Sell me the MP3 or WAV or FLAC file, give most of the money to the artist, and let me transfer the files to any device I want. Anything less is too restrictive.

      • botengang@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Only of those people subscribed to Spotify to listen to white noise. I suspect it’s a side effect…

        • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          A side effect of what? I’m really not following sp0tify’s problem with this. If people are listening to it then people are hearing the advertisements. How would they make more money without these popular streams?

          • botengang@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            I suspect that most people don’t subscribe to Spotify to listen to white noise but other music. So they might not lose a lot of revenue because white noise is not their core value proposition.

            • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              But in those times when a user wants white noise, and if sp0tify doesn’t provide it, are we sure they’re going to listen to something else on sp0tify rather than listening to white noise from another provider?

              It just seems ridiculous to deny listeners something they seem to really like that you’re already providing.

              • ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                Streaming and hosting white noise on their servers costs them money, most people who are using these podcasts probably just do it while they’re asleep and happen to have a spotify subscription. These people aren’t going to cancel a subscription because they need another app for white noise.

                Spotify could add a generator for white noise soundscapes to their app, but there are countless applications that do this already for free, including open source options. If they aren’t giving money to people uploading soundscapes, they can take more money from monthly subscriptions themselves and give more to artists, increasing their profits and making their platform more desirable than their competitors, which has been an issue for them in the past with criticism from major artists and indies alike.

                Overall these noise streams exist to game the system by getting people to play for a long time on content that’s probably just made by hitting the play button on a generator app written by someone other than the uploader, and it’s likely the only reason it happens is people don’t want to download an additional free app for that task

                • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  You’re making a lot of assumptions. If people are paying for sp0tify, let them listen to what they choose (within the restrctive enclosure of a streaming app). If advertisers are paying per play, then they’re paying sp0tify when people stream white noise.

                  Sp0tify is pirating. That’s bad enough. But now they want to dictate what you’re allowed to pirate. Gross.

    • cyd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Can’t Spotify make their own in-app white noise (generated locally rather than streamed), and push it to the top of their own search results for “white noise”?